Client Payment Portal

Visa Denials Based on Communist Party Membership

Jan 20, 2020 | Investor Visas

By:  Joseph Barnett

Reports from China indicate that the U.S. Consulate General in Guangzhou has recently increased immigrant visa denials based on INA Section 212(a)(3)(D) related to membership in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), despite the fact that such membership is required and involuntary for most to advance in university, business, or employment.

These immigrant visa denials have been issued after applicants have been placed in administrative processing under INA Section 221(g) after completing an information sheet related to their employment and education history.  It is critical that visa applicants speak with experienced immigration attorneys prior to submitting a response to the Consulate, as this may be the only time to put forward an argument to the consular officer as to why this ground of inadmissibility does not apply.  For example, the U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual provides relief for members whose membership was “non-meaningful,” as found by the U.S. Supreme Court in Rowoldt v. Pefetto, 355 U.S. 115 (1957) and Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy, 374 U.S. 469 (1963).

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP attorneys have had numerous successes preparing legal briefs to rebut claims of inadmissibility under INA Section 212(a)(3)(D).  Our firm has also obtained waivers for immigrant visa applications by filing a Form I-601, Application for Waiver of Ground of Inadmissibility with USCIS after a determination of inadmissibility has been made.

If you or your family have been impacted by this ground of inadmissibility, contact a Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP attorney today to discuss your case.

Related Posts:

5 Things to Know About USCIS’ New Policy on Expedite Criteria

By:  Joseph Barnett and Afshan Randera On May 10, 2019, USCIS updated its policy on Expedite Requests, effective immediately.  We previously blogged about expedite processing requests in the context of EB-5 applications, but this new policy applies to the adjudication of an application or petition for an immigration benefit by USCIS, though some exceptions apply.  Here are five things to know about requesting an expedite of an application or petition by USCIS:  1. Criteria. The criteria have been narrowed, and USCIS will only consider an expedite request if it meets one of the following criteria: (a) urgent humanitarian reasons; (b) compelling U.S. government interests (such as public safety and national security interests); (c) an error on the part of USCIS; or (d) severe financial loss to a company or person. 2. Severe Financial Loss. While documentation is required to support any expedite request, USCIS states that where a company or individual claims “severe financial loss,” the actual loss must be documented, and the requestor must demonstrate that he/she/it is not able to withstand the temporary financial loss that is the natural result of normal processing times.    Additionally, “severe financial loss” is not warranted if the petitioner or applicant failed to file the benefit request in a reasonable time […]

Read More

Top Five Changes Needed to the International Entrepreneur Parole Rule

The International Entrepreneur Rule (“IER”) was created to spur innovation within America as the U.S. competes with other countries to attract entrepreneurs.  The IER provides a temporary immigration benefit pursuant to the Secretary of Homeland Security’s discretionary parole authority at Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5) for international entrepreneurs who have invested in start-up companies in the United States and have attracted venture capital or other funding that may benefit the country by adding jobs to the U.S. economy.   While the IER is a step in the right direction to enhance entrepreneurship, innovation, and job creation in the United States through the legal immigration system, additional changes are needed to make it a viable program for international entrepreneurs.  Below is a list of the top five changes needed to the IER.  All of the suggested changes are consistent with President Biden’s Executive Order 14012: “Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans,” which requires the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (”DHS”) to “identify any agency actions that fail to promote access to the legal immigration system.” 1) Restrictive Definition of “Qualified Investment” at […]

Read More