Reservations on Reserved Visas: Part 2 – A Simple Congressional Solution Exists

May 18, 2022 | Investor Visas

We previously blogged about the unfair impact that the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 has on the thousands of Chinese and Vietnamese EB-5 investors who are stuck in the visa queue, waiting for their I-526 priority date to become current in the Visa Bulletin. In short: The new legislation reserves 32% of all EB-5 visas made available in each fiscal year to those who invest in rural areas (20%), high unemployment areas (10%), or in infrastructure projects (2%), and absent any action and coordination by USCIS and the State Department, these reservations will only be allocated to future EB-5 investors. As such, the total number of visas available to existing investors will likely be decreased, further extending the wait time for these investors and eligible family members.

Additionally, under the new EB-5 law, unused reserved visas are to “carryover” to immigrants in the same category for the immediately succeeding fiscal year. Any unused “carryover” reserved visas are to be made available to the “unreserved” visa category (existing investors and those who do not qualify for reserved visas under the new legislation) in the next fiscal year. DOS will also need to determine how these provisions interplay with the INA’s requirement that unused visa numbers in a fiscal year fall up from EB-5 to EB-1.

Confused yet?

We are seeking to determine how many EB-5 visas would be available in each reserved category, depending on whether DOS would allot unused reserved visas to the new “unreserved” visa category (existing investors and those who do not qualify for reserved visas under the new legislation).

Notably, with USCIS’ decision to require a Form I-956 approval prior to any new Regional Center I-526 being filed, combined with USCIS’ pathetic processing times on EB-5 cases, it’s possible that few, if any, of these newly reserved visas could actually be used in FY 2022 and FY 2023. A decision by DOS to let the “leftover” reserved visas be allocated to existing investors would be most consistent with the INA’s directive in Section 203(b) to maximize visa number use under the applicable annual limits. On the other hand, if DOS follows the plain language of the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act and ignores Section 203(b) to determine that “leftover” reserved visas be allocated solely to the reserved visa categories in the subsequent fiscal year, the visa number estimates are as follows:

However, we believe that the application of the INA language which encourages the use of numbers under each year’s annual limits would not cause the State Department to intentionally allow numbers to go unused when there is pending demand. In such a situation, the visa number use would be as follows:

This determination will have dramatic impact on DOS’ ability to advance the Final Action Date for existing investors stuck in the visa backlog.

One solution could come from Congress, a five-year technical amendment to the INA to count only principal investors against the annual limit, and not including derivative beneficiaries. Congress has made similar exceptions in the past. In 2005, INA §204(b)(4) was amended to allow the admission of certain special immigrants who qualify as international broadcasters under the EB-4 preference category, and the provision explicitly excluded spouses and children from the numerical limit in the category. Congress also excluded derivative spouses and children from numerical limitations when it authorized the admission of Special Immigrant Translators or Interpreters from Iraq and Afghanistan in 2006.

This correction by Congress would be consistent in the language of the INA that Congress did NOT intend the annual numerical limitation to be diluted by non-investor family members who would otherwise qualify for derivative visas (“Visas shall be made available, in a number not to exceed 7.1 percent of such worldwide level, to qualified immigrants seeking to enter the United States for the purpose of engaging in a new commercial enterprise. . .”).

To hear more about this important topic, register for AILA’s EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (RIA) Live Online Course.

Related Posts:

Bloomberg Article: Revival of the EB-5 Visa Program

The EB-5 visa program coveted by many wealthy overseas investors is being revived after changes aimed at curbing abuses. The EB-5 visa program has attracted $37 billion in foreign investments since 2008 and the queue of wealthy applicants from China to India is growing. Earlier this year, the Biden administration signed a law that steps up audits and site visits to deter fraud, while also creating a path for some to skip the backlog of cases if they’re willing to invest in rural areas or places with high unemployment. Roughly 100,000 EB-5 visa applicants with some $15 billion in committed investments had been in limbo since the program lapsed, trade group Invest in the USA estimates. The fresh rules are unleashing pent-up demand. Bernie Wolfsdorf, WR Immigration’s Managing Partner and a former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said his firm has been working overtime and hiring new staff to adjust to demand from countries like India, which has eclipsed the number of petitions filed from China. Drawing such investors could help prevent a brain drain, since many wealthy emigrants’ children study at top US schools, he said. Read the entire Bloomberg article here.

DHS to Withdraw Trump Opposition to International Entrepreneur Parole Rule

There have been reports that U.S. Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) will soon be withdrawing the Trump Administration’s plan to remove the International Entrepreneur Parole Program. This would be part of President Biden’s and DHS’ Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’ “America First” policy of growing the U.S. economy The International Entrepreneurial Parole provides eligibility to certain entrepreneurs to enter the United States under DHS’ parole authority, if they: Possess a substantial ownership interest in a start-up entity created within the past five years in the United States that has substantial potential for rapid growth and job creation. Have a central and active role in the start-up entity such that they are well-positioned to substantially assist with the growth and success of the business. Will provide a significant public benefit to the United States based on their role as an entrepreneur of the start-up entity The spouse of a foreign entrepreneur granted parole may also be eligible for parole and can apply for work authorization once present in the United States.  Additionally, President Biden’s immigration plan includes the creation of a new visa category to allow cities and counties to petition for immigrants to support their growth.  It states: The disparity in economic […]