Rapid-Fire Wednesdays Q&A | F-1 Visa Revocations & SEVIS Terminations | 4/23/2025

Apr 24, 2025 | Immigration Updates

The transcript version of our weekly Q&A livestream for corporate immigration professionals. Join our Immigration News Digest Newsletter for more immigration updates.

By Kimberley (Best) Robidoux & Miki Kawashima Matrician

🔥 Question: What’s going on with recent visa revocations and SEVIS terminations for F-1 students and graduates?

Response: At the end of March, the U.S. Department of State began revoking F-1 visa stamps for certain students and recent graduates of U.S. institutions. Shortly after, many of these individuals saw their SEVIS (Student and Exchange Visitor Information System) records terminated as well. Typically, the designated school official (DSO) at a university maintains these records, and terminations occur when a student fails to maintain status—like through unauthorized employment or not carrying a full course load. However, in this case, ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) itself initiated terminations, an action usually limited by statute. These terminations affected not only F-1 status, but also CPT, OPT, and STEM OPT benefits for many.

🔥 Question: Why are these SEVIS terminations happening now?

Response: In the past few weeks, the U.S. government changed its usual approach and began terminating F-1 statuses instead of—or in addition to—revoking visa stamps. This means students could no longer remain in the U.S. even if they held valid visa stamps. Some terminations appear linked to criminal records, arrests, or even situations where students were victims of crimes. In other cases, ICE terminated status without clear reasoning, and without due process. We’ve also heard of cases involving minor infractions or social media activity that were cited as justification, including posts related to the Middle East conflict being labeled as anti-Semitic.

🔥 Question: How were F-1 nonimmigrants notified of these terminations or revocations?

Response: Some received emails from the U.S. Department of State stating their F-1 visas had been revoked. Others were informed by their DSO that their SEVIS records were terminated, which meant CPT, OPT, or STEM OPT benefits were also revoked. These notifications often lacked detailed reasoning—typically stating only that the individual failed to maintain status or was flagged in a criminal records check. As a result, students were left confused and uncertain about what triggered the action, with their work authorizations being terminated immediately.

🔥 Question: Were employers notified when a student’s work authorization was terminated?

Response: No, employers were not directly notified by the U.S. government. Instead, they learned of the termination through the students themselves. Once notified, employers are legally required to stop employment to avoid violating immigration laws. This lack of formal notification places employers—especially HR and global mobility professionals—in a tough position, as they may unknowingly continue employing individuals who are no longer authorized to work.

🔥Question: What’s the impact of this on HR professionals and global mobility teams? Response: Employers are caught in a difficult spot. Without official government notification, they must rely on students to disclose their status changes. Yet once informed, they must act quickly to comply with employment laws. This has created uncertainty and stress for both employers and affected employees, particularly when work authorization termination is effective immediately.

🔥 Question: What developments occurred as the number of SEVIS terminations increased?

Response: As awareness of the issue grew, affected individuals began filing lawsuits seeking temporary restraining orders (TROs) and injunctions against ICE. Many of these legal actions were successful, with courts ordering SEVIS reinstatements and finding that plaintiffs demonstrated a strong likelihood of success and risked irreparable harm, including deportation and loss of employment or education. Some individuals have already returned to classes or resumed employment under restored OPT or STEM OPT benefits. In a few cases, the government has even reinstated status without any legal challenge, indicating the situation is highly fluid and still evolving.

🔥 Question: What’s the latest on Venezuelan TPS and work authorization?

Response: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court decision preserving TPS protections for approximately 350,000 Venezuelans. These individuals were at risk of losing their work authorization on April 3rd and deportation protection on April 7th. A stay issued on March 31st paused that outcome, and USCIS guidance followed on April 2nd. The court’s ruling means that TPS beneficiaries can continue to live and work in the U.S.—welcome news for employers and HR professionals managing compliance for affected workers.

Send us your questions via DM or using the below link!

HR Question Submission Form | Rapid-Fire Wednesdays

See you next week!

Related Posts:

Immigration Update

In this edition, find out more about the USCIS extending flexibilities for responding to certain agency requests, the State Department’s proposal to raise consular service fees for nonimmigrant and special visas, restrictions on travelers from Southern African countries lifted, and more. USCIS Extends Flexibilities for Responding to Certain Agency Requests U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is extending the flexibilities it originally announced on March 30, 2020, to assist applicants, petitioners, and requestors who are responding to certain requests. The flexibilities apply if the issuance date listed on the request, notice, or decision is between March 1, 2020, and March 26, 2022, inclusive. USCIS said it will consider a response to such requests and notices received within 60 calendar days after the response due date set in the request or notice before taking any action. The flexibilities cover responses to Requests for Evidence; Continuations to Request Evidence (N-14); Notices of Intent to Deny, Revoke, or Rescind; Notices of Intent to Terminate regional centers; and Motions to Reopen an N-400 Pursuant to 8 CFR 335.5, Receipt of Derogatory Information After Grant. In addition, USCIS will consider a Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, or Form N-336, Request for a Hearing […]

Rapid-Fire Wednesdays Q&A | Cost Containment on Green Card Sponsorship | 12/11/2024 Recap

The transcript version of our weekly Q&A livestream for corporate immigration professionals By Kimberley (Best) Robidoux & Miki Kawashima Matrician 🔥 Question: What are the key trends in green card sponsorship policies under the potential impact of a Trump 2.0 administration? Response: Companies are considering changes to their green card sponsorship programs due to concerns about increased costs and stricter regulatory scrutiny. Discussions with our benchmarking collective revealed that many global mobility professionals are reevaluating tenure requirements and cost containment measures. These trends highlight the growing need for strategic adjustments in green card policies. 🔥 Question: How does the benchmarking collective provide value to HR and global mobility professionals? Response: Our collective gathers insights directly from professionals in the field rather than relying on third-party information. Members benefit from personalized benchmarking reports tailored to their company’s data. Roundtables, both virtual and in-person, foster robust discussions where professionals exchange ideas, share experiences, and build networks, making the community a valuable resource for addressing immigration challenges. 🔥 Question: What tenure requirements are common for initiating the green card process? Response: Survey results showed that 37% of companies initiate the green card process on a case-by-case basis, while 24% start after 12 months […]