Five Things Investors Should Ask When Selecting an EB-5 Project – Due Diligence 101

Jul 14, 2020 | Investor Visas

By: Joseph M. Barnett, Esq.

With 39,443 I-526 EB-5 petitions filed in the past three fiscal years, at least $19 billion has been invested in the U.S. economy through the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program during the period from October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2016.  As of May 30, 2017, there are 1,258 Regional Centers designated by USCIS.  Regional Centers offer a variety of investment opportunities to prospective immigrant investors, including real-estate development, hotels, manufacturing, medical facilities, and shopping complex, among many others.

Accordingly, EB-5 investors now have an array of choice.  Selecting an immigration compliant project is the most important aspect of the process. Before investing, investors should perform extensive due diligence to ensure that they will receive a permanent green card, as well as ensuring the likely repayment of their EB-5 capital investment upon final approval of the case.

Below are five items prospective EB-5 investors should ask prior to making an EB-5 investment decision:

  1. Reputation and EB-5 Experience of the Regional Centers and Developers. It’s critical to understand who will be using EB-5 capital to create jobs for U.S. workers.  Who are the principals, and what are their qualifications?  Do they have a track record of previously successful EB-5 projects? Did previous projects receive Form I-526 or Form I-829 approvals?  Has the Regional Center returned EB-5 investment capital after Form I-829 approval? If there is a manager of the job creating entity (such as, for a hotel or a medical facility), what is the operating history of the manager?
  2. Infrastructure, Oversight, and Administration of Regional Center and EB-5 Project. Do the Regional Center and EB-5 project developers have the necessary infrastructure to carry out an EB-5 project, with appropriate staff, office, and funds to operate?  Is there a system of reporting and notifying EB-5 investors of developments on the project on a regular basis?  Does the EB-5 project have an established administration framework that provides adequate oversight to ensure the funds are correctly deployed and spent appropriately (no comingling of funds for other projects)?  Is the Regional Center and EB-5 project set up to meet relevant federal, state, and local legal requirements, including U.S. securities laws?
  3. Capital Stack of EB-5 Project. If EB-5 capital is the sole source of capital for the project, then it must be understood that the development and operational timeline of the project will be based on the timeline for fundraising efforts.  If the total amount of EB-5 capital is not raised, will the EB-5 project be able to proceed, and will the jobs be created.  Have other sources of capitalization for the project been identified and formalized?  How is the EB-5 investor positioned within the capital stack? Does the developer have any “skin in the game”?  If the business fails, what type of security interest or collateral is there for the EB-5 investor?
  4. Job Creation. EB-5 is a job creation program with an immigration benefit.   If the EB-5 project which the investor invests in does not create enough jobs, then it is possible the EB-5 investor may not be able to obtain a full green card.  How many jobs are expected to be created for EB-5 investors?  Are the jobs based on successful operations and the revenue of a company?  If so, has construction already started and indirect/induced jobs already created?
  5. Miscellaneous Considerations. Aside from these questions, EB-5 investors should be aware of the different types of offerings in the market.  Is it a debt or equity offering?  Is an escrow account being used and when are funds released from escrow?  What are the terms for repayment in the event the Form I-526 is denied?  Is the project located in a location which most likely meets the proposed, or reformed definitions of “Targeted Employment Area”?  Is the Regional Center subject to an SEC investigation or complaint?

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal, LLP assists investors in the immigration filings under the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program including the preparation of Form I-526 and Form I-829 filings.  In addition, we assist developers and other in setting-up Regional Centers, filing I-924 Exemplar petitions, filing of the annual Form I-924As, as well as providing EB-5 compliance services to existing Regional Centers and New Commercial Enterprises. 

Related Posts:

Mandamus Litigation – the Solution for Unreasonably Delayed Employment and Travel Authorization Cards

USCIS processing times have been frustratingly long and made even worse due to COVID-19. Unfortunately, the delays are now getting longer and adversely impacting the lives of employers, employees and families. As a result, more immigrants are turning to the courts for a solution. The judicial system can provide relief when experiencing unreasonable delays for immigrant benefits – including processing an employment authorization document (EAD) and advance parole travel permits (AP) after an adjustment of status application has been filed. Depending on the facts, WR Immigration (WR) has a solution to compel USCIS to finalize adjudication within a reasonable amount of time by filing a lawsuit in federal court. Filing a lawsuit against USCIS to adjudicate an EAD/AP has sadly become more common in other U.S. immigration contexts, such as for nonimmigrants on H-4 visas seeking work permission. The same legal theories can be applied to persons with pending adjustments including EB-5 investors with pending EADs/APs. EAD/AP applications that have been pending for well over 6 months may now be actionable. In this process, WR attorneys prepare a complaint including information about each individual’s case and then the lawsuit is filed in federal district court.  After serving a summons and the […]

Four New Year’s Resolutions to Prepare for Immigration Policy in the Trump Administration

By: Robert Blanco, Esq. President-elect Trump made immigration a significant issue in his campaign, promising to enact a host of immigration policies focusing on curbing illegal immigration and increased screening procedures. Although the details of any new immigration policies have not been set, it is likely that there will be an increase in enforcement and more restrictive adjudications across the board. With that in mind, here are a few New Year’s resolutions to implement in preparation for the likely changes in 2017 and beyond. Check your I-94 on each entry An I-94 record is proof of foreign nationals’ immigration status in the U.S., including the class of admission and the date such status expires. Since Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) stopped issuing paper I-94 cards and began digitizing the I-94 process, foreign nationals may look up their I-94 information on the CBP website. However, even if the foreign national was admitted properly by the inspecting officer and received a stamp in his or her passport, it is quite common to see errors on the online record. Ensuring that one is admitted properly is critically important to maintaining status. First, the penalty for violating status for 6 months is a 3-year bar to entering the U.S. This increases to […]