Canada Alert: Significant Changes to Intra-Company Transfer Work Permits

Oct 8, 2024 | Immigration Updates, Permanent Immigration Visas

Canada has just made significant changes to the requirements to qualify for an intra-company transfer (ICT) work permit. This will have a major impact on many companies seeking to employ foreign national workers in Canada. Note that workers who are citizens of a country that has a free trade agreement with Canada will not be directly impacted by these changes. A list of free trade agreement countries is included at the end of this alert.

  • Company requirements – To sponsor workers for ICT work permits companies must now meet the following requirements:
    • Have offices in at least two countries other than Canada – The company seeking to transfer the worker (the “sending company”) must be a Multinational Corporation (MNC), meaning it must have business operations in at least one country other than its home country. Canada does not count, so this means companies must have an office in their home country, in Canada and in a third country.
    • Have physical office space in Canada – The Canadian company that will sponsor the worker (the “receiving company”) must have physical business premises where the transferred worker can work. Hybrid work and work at client premises appear to be permissible so long as the worker also reports to a physical office.  Businesses with no physical premises in Canada are no longer eligible to sponsor workers for ICT work permits. Home offices, shared co-working spaces and mailing offices are not sufficient.
    • Be actively engaged in business – The companies involved in the transfer must be actively engaged in business and have ongoing business operations. This means they must be doing business on a regular and systematic basis and must be continuously providing goods or services.
  • Two years of specialized knowledge experience – Workers seeking an ICT work permit under the specialized knowledge subcategory will usually need to demonstrate that they have acquired the specialized knowledge relevant to the position they will fill in Canada over a minimum of two years working with the sending company outside Canada.
  • Same position – The position with the Canadian receiving company must be the “same” position with the worker holds with the sending company. Previously it was sufficient if the position was merely “similar.”

Exemption – Workers who are citizens (or permanent residents, where noted) of the following countries are exempt from these changes on the basis of free trade treaties with Canada, although it is possible that we will see some increased scrutiny on applications across the board:

  • Australia (citizen or permanent resident)
  • Brunei
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • European Union Countries
  • Japan
  • Malaysia
  • Mexico
  • New Zealand (citizen or permanent resident)
  • Peru
  • South Korea
  • UK
  • USA

If you’d like to learn more, contact your WR Immigration attorney for guidance.

Related Posts:

Immigration Update

In this edition, find the latest news on pending Supreme Court cases, updates to the Exchange Visitor Program, expansion of USCIS’ myProgress and more! Three Important Cases Pending Before U.S. Supreme Court Three important cases are pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. According to observers, at stake are the legitimacy of the current U.S. immigration court system and the longstanding precedent decision, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, and its standard for deference to federal administrative agency decisions. The cases include: Details:  Back to Top DOS Proposes Updates to Au Pair Exchange Visitor Program The Department of State (DOS) has issued a proposed rule to amend the Exchange Visitor Program regulations governing the au pair category to “clarify and modernize” the program. Among other things, the proposed rule would restructure the child care and educational components, replace the EduCare program with a part-time option, enhance au pair and host family orientation requirements, formalize standard operating procedures for rematching au pairs with new host families, and propose new requirements to strengthen au pair protections. DOS said it encourages public comment on the proposed rule, particularly on restructuring the au pair program and calculating weekly compensation. DOS initially said it would accept […]

Supreme Court Decision on Birthright Citizenship

The Supreme Court issued an important decision today in cases challenging President Trump’s Executive Order on birthright citizenship. The Court limited its decision to federal courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions, allowing the government to move forward with implementation of the Order, but leaving open the possibility of legal challenges to the Order and its implementation. Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the majority opinion, which did not address whether President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship is constitutional. The Court focused its decision on the procedures federal courts must follow, and the orders federal courts can issue, when states and citizens challenge actions of the federal government. The Court’s decision today means there will be continuing and evolving legal challenges to the birthright citizenship order in the federal courts. Nationwide Injunctions Generally, the Court limited federal courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions to executive orders and broad national policies. It explained that courts should normally only block federal policies for the individuals or organizations that bring a lawsuit, unless a statute or class action process allows broader relief. This ruling makes it less likely that a single lawsuit will be able to stop a federal policy from taking effect across the entire country. […]