August 2022 Visa Bulletin

Jul 12, 2022 | Immigration Updates

The Department of State has issued its August 2022 Visa Bulletin, and there is modest movement in both the final action dates and dates for filing in the EB-3 preference category for India and China, but no change from July in the EB-2 category.  Final action dates for EB-3 China will advance 30 days to April 22, 2018, while final action dates for EB-3 India while also advance 30 days to February 15, 2012.  Dates for filing for EB-3 China will advance nearly 2 months to May 22, 2018, while dates for filing for EB-3 India will advance one month to February 22, 2012.  Both final action dates and dates for filing remain unchanged from July 2022 for China and India EB-2.  All other countries under EB-2 and EB-3 will remain current, and EB-1 also remains current for all countries including India and China. 

USCIS has announced that the final action dates chart must continue to be used for adjustment of status filings in August.

For EB-5 cases, the August visa bulletin will remain at November 22, 2015 and application filing date will advance one week to December 22, 2015 for C5, T5, I5, and R5 China.  All other EB-5 dates will remain current for all other countries.

For new immigrant investors who file now, it’s possible to skip the lengthy visa wait time if investing in a rural, high-unemployment, or infrastructure project.  For existing investors, despite there having been 140,000 unused FY 2021 Family numbers, resulting in the 280,00 FY 2022 Employment limit, it appears that many of these employment-based immigrant visas will be lost this fiscal year without judicial intervention.

For questions, contact your WR Immigration attorney, and stay tuned to WR Immigration for all the latest news and guidelines.

Related Posts:

Rapid-Fire Wednesdays Q&A |Immigration Landscape: Whats New?| 3/5/2025

The transcript version of our weekly Q&A livestream for corporate immigration professionals. Join our Immigration News Digest Newsletter for more immigration updates. By Kimberley (Best) Robidoux & Miki Kawashima Matrician 🔥 Question: What is the proposed Gold Card program, and how does it compare to the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program? Response: The proposed Trump Gold Card program requires an investment of $5 million paid directly to the U.S. government to reduce national debt. In contrast, the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program requires a minimum investment of $1.05 million in a U.S. business or $800,000 in targeted employment areas to stimulate job creation and capital investment. Unlike the EB-5 program, the Gold Card proposal does not require job creation. Additionally, while the EB-5 program grants eligibility for permanent residence with a pathway to citizenship after meeting job creation and residency requirements, the Gold Card program claims to offer a direct pathway to citizenship, though details are still unclear. Another key distinction is taxation—Gold Card holders would be taxed only on U.S.-derived income, whereas EB-5 participants are subject to U.S. taxation on worldwide income. Importantly, this proposal is not yet law and would require congressional approval. 🔥 Question: What is the new alien […]

Immigration Update

In this edition, read about the EB-5 program’s outlook, final action dates advancing in the Visa Bulletin for July, USCIS reports on FY 2022 H-1B cap registration, and more! EB-5 Program Set to Expire June 30, Outlook is Uncertain in Short Term The EB-5 regional center program, under which foreign investors indirectly finance projects in the United States in exchange for green cards, is set to expire on June 30, 2021. Whether Congress will be able to reach agreement on a plan to extend it remains uncertain, at least in the short term. The program’s regional centers have funneled billions of foreign investor dollars into large projects such as City Pier A in Battery Park, New York; Hudson Yards in New York City; and the revitalization of Cleveland, Ohio’s riverfront. A bill proposed by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) would restructure the program. Some in the industry support the proposal as a way of avoiding the program’s expiration, while others support shortening the EB-5 program’s reauthorization period or making other compromises. However, some developers want to make it easier to raise money and indicated they would not support any bill that doesn’t do that. The program has […]