The Life Sciences Talent Squeeze and Foreign-Born Workers

Aug 17, 2021 | Global, Human Resources Services

It’s no secret to MassBio members that the life sciences is on the front end of a significant boom. Fueled by innovation, collaboration, and accelerated funding, the signs of growth are clear.

We’re seeing IPOs, overseas expansions, and an influx of venture capital financing into well-known Boston players. “There has…been a massive amount of investment, acquisitions, public offerings, and laboratory construction during a time when many businesses struggled to keep the lights on,” Scott Kirsner pointed out in his June 15 column. “The biotech sector seems poised to emerge from the pandemic as the city’s dominant and most visible industry.”

With so much activity and opportunity, talent acquisition and development are struggling to keep pace. Karla Talanian dug into this topic in a recent MassBio post about how companies can continue to develop a workforce to meet the increasing industry demands. She noted that in Massachusetts, recruiting is more intense than the national averages: 18% of jobs require at least a Ph.D., compared with 12% nationally.

The squeeze for such talent forecasts to be even tighter going forward: while the pursuit of doctorate degrees is high in this region, it is much lower nationwide. “Since recruitment for these individuals is typically conducted on a national scale,” Karla wrote, “this dearth of new talent is especially worrisome for an industry that relies on a highly-skilled, hyper-educated workforce.”

Certainly, part of the solution is cultivating younger talent, as Karla suggests. Foreign-born talent, however, is also a critical component. Immigrants make up around 25% of all U.S. science and technology workers and around 50% of the doctoral-level life science workforce nationwide. In 2018, more than 43% of life scientists, such as biologists and health scientists, and 36% of physical scientists, such as chemists, were foreign-born workers.

Talent from abroad also feeds the company leadership pipeline. A study by INSEAD (Institut Européen d’Administration des Affaires) found that out of 147,336 U.S. executives for which educational background was available, 3,098 corporate leaders were of Chinese ethnicity, 3,095 Indian, and 1,395 Middle Eastern. The remaining 139,748 were from other ethnicities, including European. As the study authors noted, “If the U.S. hopes to address its leadership shortage as its population ages, it needs to embrace immigration and acknowledge the significant contribution that immigrant executives already play.”

To create and maintain an immigration program that provides regular access to this talent, life sciences leaders and HR professionals should know the options available to them. The most commonly used visa to bring foreign employees to the U.S. is the H-1B visa. Unfortunately, Congress has capped this visa category at a number far less than our economy needs; forward-thinking companies are therefore leveraging alternatives to reduce their reliance on H-1Bs. For instance, an O-1 visa is a merit-based visa for workers with extraordinary abilities who are recognized within their field. TN visas can be used for professionals from Canada and Mexico in designated occupations, and companies can use E-3 visas for professionals in specialty occupations from Australia.

Companies willing to recruit students and recent graduates have additional options. Under an F-1 visa, international students who attend or have graduated from an accredited U.S. institution can obtain Optional Practical Training, which provides for up to 12 months of employment in the field of study with extensions of an additional 24 months for those with degrees in STEM fields. The J-1 visa lets employers place foreign workers in various roles like interns, trainees, and research assistants.

As new members of the MassBio community, we’re excited to share our expertise in life sciences immigration – and to learn more about how companies in our community are growing and managing their talent. Our goal is to help empower innovation by bringing outstanding foreign-born talent into these change-making organizations, and we look forward to an ongoing exchange of ideas with member companies.

Originally published on MassBio.org (August 12, 2021): https://www.massbio.org/news/recent-news/the-life-sciences-talent-squeeze-and-foreign-born-workers/ by Julie Galvin

Related Posts:

April Global Immigration Update

WR Immigration’s April global immigration updates include the latest developments on Australia’s work visa category, Brazil’s e-visa requirements, new Canada entry requirements, and much more! Australia Australia is poised to adopt a new Skills in Demand work visa category. This category will have three pathways under which foreign nationals can qualify as follows: The government group tasked with review of occupations for these pathways has just released a draft of the core skills occupations list, which will determine which jobs are eligible for this pathway. The list is available at Draft Core Skills Occupations List (CSOL) for Consultation | Jobs and Skills Australia. While not finalized, the list has helpfully been broken down into occupations that are confidently “on” the list, those that are “off” and those that are “targeted for consultation.” Brazil Brazil has again postponed its implementation of the new requirement for U.S., Canadian, and Australian citizens to hold e-visas to travel for tourism or business until 2025. Accordingly, those traveling to Brazil in 2024 no longer need to worry about implementation of the new visa requirement. Canada Canada has quite suddenly implemented new entry requirements for Mexican nationals. Most Mexican nationals are now required to obtain a […]

CANADA: Fast-track immigration for fracophones?

The Québec immigration department is closing a month-long consultation period with stakeholders on four questions intended to revamp a fast-track immigration stream leading to permanent residence in Canada for francophone foreigners living in Québec. The topics the Québec government is consulting on are: Which eligibility criteria should the immigration department apply in their selection of workers and students intending to fast-track their permanent residence? How can immigrants be encouraged to settle outside the urban centers? Should the selection criteria prioritize experience gained in Québec, or immigrants whose profile match the labor market needs, or both? How can “overqualification” be avoided? Should graduates become eligible for fast-track permanent immigration only after 1 year of work experience, and should the work experience have been obtained in their field of study, or at a level that matches their qualification? The Québec immigration department had been heavily criticized for having attempted to overhaul the fast-track immigration process without public consultations in the fall of 2019, and had been forced to withdraw their bill. Details: Consultation sur le Programme de l’expérience québécoise (PEQ), http://www.mifi.gouv.qc.ca/fr/dossiers/consultation-peq.html Québec government’s Consultation Guide, http://www.mifi.gouv.qc.ca/publications/fr/dossiers/DOC_consultation.pdf