Client Payment Portal

Visa Denials Based on Communist Party Membership

Jan 20, 2020 | Investor Visas

By:  Joseph Barnett

Reports from China indicate that the U.S. Consulate General in Guangzhou has recently increased immigrant visa denials based on INA Section 212(a)(3)(D) related to membership in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), despite the fact that such membership is required and involuntary for most to advance in university, business, or employment.

These immigrant visa denials have been issued after applicants have been placed in administrative processing under INA Section 221(g) after completing an information sheet related to their employment and education history.  It is critical that visa applicants speak with experienced immigration attorneys prior to submitting a response to the Consulate, as this may be the only time to put forward an argument to the consular officer as to why this ground of inadmissibility does not apply.  For example, the U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual provides relief for members whose membership was “non-meaningful,” as found by the U.S. Supreme Court in Rowoldt v. Pefetto, 355 U.S. 115 (1957) and Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy, 374 U.S. 469 (1963).

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP attorneys have had numerous successes preparing legal briefs to rebut claims of inadmissibility under INA Section 212(a)(3)(D).  Our firm has also obtained waivers for immigrant visa applications by filing a Form I-601, Application for Waiver of Ground of Inadmissibility with USCIS after a determination of inadmissibility has been made.

If you or your family have been impacted by this ground of inadmissibility, contact a Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP attorney today to discuss your case.

Related Posts:

Ten Things to Know About Communist Party Membership Inadmissibility

By:  Bernard Wolfsdorf and Joseph Barnett Communist party membership issues are becoming more common in visa cases.  Our firm has seen an increase in scrutiny by U.S. consulates on this issue.  It is important to focus on this issue with China as #1, and Vietnam as #2, in the number of EB-5 immigrant visas issued and adjustment of status applications approved in Fiscal Year 2017. Immigration attorneys, Regional Centers, migration agencies, and intending immigrants must understand the rules, exceptions, and waivers to this ground of inadmissibility.  Here are 10 things to know about this topic: The Immigration and Nationality Act. Individuals who are inadmissible are not permitted by law to enter or remain in the United States.  The Immigration and Nationality Act sets forth grounds for inadmissibility in Section 212.  One of grounds, found at INA Section 212(a)(3)(D), is “membership in a totalitarian party,” which states: “Any immigrant who is or has been a member of or affiliated with the Communist or any other totalitarian party (or subdivision or affiliate thereof), domestic or foreign, is inadmissible.” Definition of “Affiliate”. The term affiliate, as used in INA Section 212(a)(3)(D), means “an organization related to, or identified with, a proscribed party or association, including any section, subsidiary, […]

Read More

Frequently Asked Questions on the EB-5 Regional Center Program in December 2021

The EB-5 Regional Center program continues to lapse as the U.S. Congress sifts through legislative priorities like the President Biden’s “Build Better Back” bill, the defense budget, the debt ceiling, and others.  It is beyond frustrating for many who have been waiting anxiously since June 30, 2021, for reauthorization. Bernie Wolfsdorf, WR Immigration’s Managing Partner, stated, “If the U.S. government fails to extend the program, after 30 consecutive extensions, this would adversely impact the U.S. as a reliable investment market, and we are likely to see a further steep decline in Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). FDI has recently recorded a 49% drop to an estimated $134 billion. This will ultimately impact the U.S. in many critical areas including job loss. While I am confident Congress will extend, or at least grandfathering existing immigrant investors who have followed the rules, it is difficult to understand the logic where Congress allocates 55,000 green cards in a random giveaway lottery, but immigrant investors who have put billions into the U.S. economy, and have created tens of thousands of jobs, are forgotten. Many investors have diligently saved every dollar to invest in the EB-5 program to give their children the opportunity to study and […]

Read More