7 Years for a “Special” Form I-526 Approval

Apr 22, 2021 | Investor Visas

On April 14, 2021, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) approved our former client, Mr.  Zhang’s, Form I-526 – Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur.  His case had been pending since December 2013. 

This is a special Form I-526 approval, as Mr. Zhang was one of the two named plaintiffs in Zhang v. USCIS et al.¸ in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected USCIS’ interpretation of the term “capital” in the EB-5 regulations.  The circuit court held that the term “cash” unambiguously includes the proceeds of third-party loans, stating “Cash is fungible, and it passes from buyer to seller without imposing on the seller any of the buyer’s obligations to his own creditors.”  The court found that USCIS’ position was inconsistent with the regulation and can thus have no legal effect.    

USCIS has not officially responded to the Zhang decision.  Mr. Zhang’s Form I-526 approval appears to confirm that USCIS will not be appealing the court’s decision to the U.S. Supreme Court for further review.

Despite the five months that have passed since the decision, USCIS’ online Policy Manual regarding the use of loan proceeds as capital has not been updated to reflect it, nor has its Class Action Member Identification Notice.  We call on USCIS to update its Policy Manual so that the court’s decision is binding on all current and future EB-5 applicants.    

Importantly, Mr. Zhang’s children may still be able to apply for conditional permanent residence due to the relief provided in the Child Status Protection Act, which allows derivative beneficiaries to subtract the amount of time a Form I-526 is pending from their age as long as they “seek to acquire” a visa within one year of approval in order to get under 21 years of age. Here the silver lining is that the 7 years, 3 months and 22 days it took to approve this petition can now be subtracted from the children’s age, potentially making them eligible for derivative immigrant status.  

While we are happy to see this result, we are saddened that it took so long for USCIS to approve the petition.  Rather than applying the plain language of the regulation, USCIS decided to add additional, unlawful requirements on the use of loans to fund an EB-5 investment.  Now that USCIS has been corrected by a federal court, it is time to modify its Policy Manual appropriately.       

Related Posts:

WR Secures First Form I-526E Approval

WR Immigration, a distinguished U.S. law firm that specializes with EB-5 visas, has secured its first approval on a Form I-526E, Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor since the U.S. Congress passed the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (“RIA”).       This is particularly exciting news because it only took around 8 months for USCIS to approve the Form I-526E, without any Request for Evidence related to the immigrant investor’s lawful source of investment capital.  It appears that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) is following Congress’ mandate in the RIA to prioritize the processing of Form I-526Es related to qualifying investments in rural areas.    USCIS must first approve a Regional Center’s Form I-956F, Application for Approval of an Investment in a Commercial Enterprise prior to approving any Form I-526E filed by an immigrant investor in that EB-5 project.  WR Immigration filed a writ of mandamus lawsuit against USCIS on the pending Form I-956F earlier this summer and was able to get USCIS to take action and approve the Form I-956F.      Even more exciting is that the immigrant investor, a Chinese national, will face no visa backlog and can immediately apply to the U.S. Consulate in Guangzhou for an immigrant […]

Top Five Changes Needed to the International Entrepreneur Parole Rule

The International Entrepreneur Rule (“IER”) was created to spur innovation within America as the U.S. competes with other countries to attract entrepreneurs.  The IER provides a temporary immigration benefit pursuant to the Secretary of Homeland Security’s discretionary parole authority at Section 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(d)(5) for international entrepreneurs who have invested in start-up companies in the United States and have attracted venture capital or other funding that may benefit the country by adding jobs to the U.S. economy.   While the IER is a step in the right direction to enhance entrepreneurship, innovation, and job creation in the United States through the legal immigration system, additional changes are needed to make it a viable program for international entrepreneurs.  Below is a list of the top five changes needed to the IER.  All of the suggested changes are consistent with President Biden’s Executive Order 14012: “Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New Americans,” which requires the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (”DHS”) to “identify any agency actions that fail to promote access to the legal immigration system.” 1) Restrictive Definition of “Qualified Investment” at […]