When Do Employees Need a Business Visa versus a Work Permit?

Dec 16, 2019 | Global

Please note that the contents of this article should serve as general guidelines and should not be taken as legal advice. Various factors play a role in making the final determination of the proper immigration procedure to each country. Please contact your WR Immigration attorney for case specific advice.

What is the basic difference between a business visa and work permit?

  • A business visa is granted to foreign nationals who seek to attend business meetings, conferences, or engage in other activities that do not involve productive, gainful employment. It is usually appropriate for short term visits to the host country.
  • A work permit is granted to foreign nationals who intend to engage in productive employment, such as taking a part-time or full-time job in the host country.

What factors are usually considered to make the determination between a business visa and work permit?

Several factors play a role including but not limited to:

  • Activities to be performed in the host country
  • Length of stay in the host country
  • Where compensation is received

To gain a better understanding of the difference, ask yourself the following questions:

[table id=7 /]

What do I need to know about business visas and work permits in a global context?

No two countries are identical in the way they manage immigration. The definition of “gainful employment’ and “work” can vary from country to country. Some countries issue business visas for an expansive range of activities, while others are more restrictive.

Can you help me with determining if I need a Business visa or a Work Permit?

Yes! We have a complimentary, no charge WR Global Immigration Business Visa Assessment Tool that can help!  https://wolfsdorf.com/business-visa-assessment/ These assessments are individually reviewed by WR’s global immigration team in conjunction with local counsel in the host country to ensure that we are advising our clients accurately. We take into consideration the most up-to-date immigration regulations, host country factors, and the client’s unique goals and needs to secure the best outcomes for our clients.

Disclaimer: This blog is not intended to be legal advice. Please contact a Wolfsdorf Rosenthal immigration attorney or email the WR Global Immigration team at Global@Wolfsdorf.com for case specific advice.

Related Posts:

Belgium: All Non-Essential Travel Forbidden for Persons with Main Place of Residence Located Abroad

A change in legislation is consequential for European Union (EU)/Schengen travel to Belgium. A change in legislation, published in the Belgian Official Journal on January 26, 2020, and effective January 27, 2021, will have substantial consequences for EU/Schengen travel to Belgium. Between January 27, 2021, and March 1, 2021, all non-essential travel is forbidden for all those whose main place of residence is located abroad. This does not change the situation for travel from most third countries, which was already limited to non-essential travel. However, the EU/Schengen travel restriction is new. Third countries are defined as non-EU/non-Schengen countries. The definition of essential travel and the required formalities depend on the country of origin and/or citizenship: Travel from a third country, other than “safe” third countries (currently Australia, South Korea, Japan, New Zealand, Rwanda, Singapore, and Thailand), by a third country national with main residence in the third country (e.g., United States, Canada, India): An overview of essential travels is available at the website of the Belgian federal immigration office (point 2.2., https://dofi.ibz.be/sites/dvzoe/EN/Pages/International%20travels.aspx). An essential travel certificate, issued by the Belgian embassy/consulate with jurisdiction, will in principle be required. Before the traveler boards, the transporter must check whether an essential travel […]

CANADA: Fast-track immigration for fracophones?

The Québec immigration department is closing a month-long consultation period with stakeholders on four questions intended to revamp a fast-track immigration stream leading to permanent residence in Canada for francophone foreigners living in Québec. The topics the Québec government is consulting on are: Which eligibility criteria should the immigration department apply in their selection of workers and students intending to fast-track their permanent residence? How can immigrants be encouraged to settle outside the urban centers? Should the selection criteria prioritize experience gained in Québec, or immigrants whose profile match the labor market needs, or both? How can “overqualification” be avoided? Should graduates become eligible for fast-track permanent immigration only after 1 year of work experience, and should the work experience have been obtained in their field of study, or at a level that matches their qualification? The Québec immigration department had been heavily criticized for having attempted to overhaul the fast-track immigration process without public consultations in the fall of 2019, and had been forced to withdraw their bill. Details: Consultation sur le Programme de l’expérience québécoise (PEQ), http://www.mifi.gouv.qc.ca/fr/dossiers/consultation-peq.html Québec government’s Consultation Guide, http://www.mifi.gouv.qc.ca/publications/fr/dossiers/DOC_consultation.pdf