What Does the December 2021 Visa Bulletin Mean for New “Direct” EB-5 Investors?

Nov 22, 2021 | Investor Visas

The December 2021 Visa Bulletin states that the EB-5 direct visa categories have become “Current” for December 2021, including for nationals born in mainland-China or India or Vietnam.  This means that “direct’ EB-5 investors with Form I-526 approvals at this time can immediately apply for an immigrant visa at a U.S. Consulate or Embassy or adjust status if in the United States and otherwise eligible. However, it is not technically correct to say that there is “no waiting line” for China-mainland direct EB-5, as we do not know what future Visa Bulletins will indicate when a direct I-526 case filed today is eventually approved.  It remains to be seen whether this “current” status will hold, and for how long. Many experts believe this designation of China and India and Vietnam being current for direct cases will not last because its likely the regional center program will be re-authorized soon and then demand will pick up again resulting in massive retrogression for China, Vietnam and possibly India as well.

The Visa Bulletin specifically notes that when the EB-5 Regional Center program is reauthorized, there would be significantly more demand for EB-5 visas at that time (in particular for mainland-China):  “If China-mainland born number use were to materialize at a level which could potentially jeopardize visa availability under the overall FY-2022 Employment-based Fifth preference annual limit, it would then be necessary to once again impose a final action date.” 

Additionally, one of the biggest bottlenecks in the immigration process during COVID-19 has been the transfer of approved cases from USCIS to the National Visa Center and scheduling of immigrant visa interviews abroad.  Fortunately, the State Department recently rescinded its Immigrant Visa  Prioritization guidance at the end of last week, which should speed up the processing of EB-5 visas appointments abroad. Under the new policy, U.S. embassies and consulates have broad discretion to determine how to prioritize visa appointments among the range of visa classes as safely as possible, subject to local conditions and restrictions.

Related Posts:

WR Immigration Podcast: Chatting with Charlie: Unpacking the Latest Visa Bulletins

In this month’s Chatting with Charlie Director of Visa Consulting Charlie Oppenheim, Partner Charina Garcia and Senior Associate Laura Bloniarz update HR professionals with the latest employment-based green card processing information from the latest Visa Bulletins. Learning Topics Include:– April Visa Bulletin Summary– Understanding 2022 State Department Annual Report Table V– Predictions and Trends in Adjustment of Status Applications and Consular Processing– Common Case Profile for HR Discussion

Mandamus Lawsuits on Delayed EB-5 Adjudications

By:  Joseph Barnett Writ of mandamus lawsuits against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) are en vogue, and for good reason:  as of December 2, 2019, the estimated time range to process a Form I-526 petition has skyrocketed from 31.5 months to 52 months, and online case inquiries are only accepted for petitions filed before September 7, 2015.  This is just wrong, and a travesty to those who have invested at least $500,000 and paid thousands of dollars more in fees to get their applications processed.  Extended processing times can cause a detrimental effect on those who are patiently (and nervously) waiting in nonimmigrant status for I-526 approval or for those whose children will “age out”, and a writ of mandamus may be necessary to get USCIS to act when its unstated stated goal is to delay, discourage, and deny.  Here are five things to know about lawsuits in federal court on delayed EB-5 adjudications.    USCIS Employee Hours to Process Form I-526 Petitions. When USCIS increased the filing fee for a Form I-526 petition in 2016 from $1,500 to $3,675, it stated the increase would further “efforts with the goal of improving operational efficiencies while enhancing predictability and transparency in the adjudication process.”  It […]