Rapid-Fire Wednesdays Q&A | Impact of Recent U.S. Supreme Court Rulings | 1/22/2025 Recap

Jan 23, 2025 | Immigration Updates

The transcript version of our weekly Q&A livestream for corporate immigration professionals. Join our Immigration News Digest Newsletter for more immigration updates.

By Kimberley (Best) Robidoux & Miki Kawashima Matrician

🔥 Question: What is the significance of the Bouarfa v. Mayorkas case for immigration professionals?

Response: In December, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the Bouarfa v. Mayorkas case that federal courts cannot review visa revocations, which are under the discretion of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The ruling clarified that if a statute mandates USCIS to approve or deny a case based on specific criteria, the denial can be challenged in federal court. However, if the decision is discretionary, such as in visa revocations, the court has no authority to intervene.

This decision underscores the finality of DHS’s discretion, leaving applicants with limited recourse—primarily refiling applications while addressing any issues causing revocation, provided those reasons are known. The implications extend to both family-based and employment-based immigration cases, as the same principles apply to visa petition revocations.

🔥 Question: How does this case impact employment-based immigration cases?

Response: For employment-based cases, if an employer’s immigrant visa petition is denied, the denial can still be challenged in court. However, once the petition is approved, any subsequent revocation of the petition or denial of an adjustment of status application is discretionary and cannot be contested in federal court. This could have significant consequences, such as employees losing their ability to remain in the U.S. or employers losing essential staff.

🔥 Question: What does the Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo case mean for immigration policy?

Response: The Supreme Court’s decision in the Loper Bright case, issued in mid-2024, overturned the 1984 Chevron precedent, which required courts to defer to federal agencies’ reasonable interpretations of statutes. This shift puts decision-making power back into the courts and away from federal agencies, marking a move toward deregulation.

🔥 Question: How might Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo positively impact employment-based immigration?

Response: For employers sponsoring visas, this ruling could empower them to challenge denials in court without deference being given to DHS’s interpretation of regulations. This is especially relevant in light of restrictive policies that may emerge under an administration with anti-immigrant tendencies.

Beyond employment-based immigration, Loper-Bright also benefits individuals in removal proceedings. Federal courts can now overturn negative Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decisions that previously infringed on due process rights. Justice Gorsuch’s concurring opinion highlighted the case’s potential to undo many of these unfavorable decisions.

🔥 Question: Are there risks for programs created by federal agencies?

Response: Yes. Programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), H4 Employment Authorization Documents (EADs), and STEM OPT extensions, which were established through agency regulation rather than statute, may face challenges. Anti-immigrant plaintiffs could potentially contest these programs in court under the new legal framework.

For example, while the D.C. Circuit Court upheld the H4 EAD program in 2024, similar programs might not withstand future legal challenges. Any disruptions to these work authorization programs could significantly impact employers and employees reliant on them.

🔥 Question: Could this lead to more immigration-related lawsuits?

Response: Likely. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson cautioned about a potential “tsunami of lawsuits” against federal agencies. On the positive side, this may compel DHS to settle cases more quickly, as seen during the previous administration when corporate immigration attorneys sued USCIS frequently.

Send us your questions via DM or using the below link!

HR Question Submission Form | Rapid-Fire Wednesdays

See you next week!

Related Posts:

Immigration Update

In this edition, find the latest news on DOS’ latest H-1B Guidance, DHS TPS and Student Relief, USCIS’ “Extraordinary Circumstances” and much more! DOS Provides Guidance, FAQs on Domestic Renewal of H-1B Visas for Certain Applicants The Department of State (DOS) has released guidance and frequently asked questions on its new pilot program to resume domestic visa renewals for qualified H-1B nonimmigrant visa applicants who meet certain requirements. The pilot program will accept applications from January 29, 2024, through April 1, 2024, or when all 20,000 application slots are filled, whichever comes first. DOS said it will make available a maximum of 20,000 application slots during this pilot program. Approximately 2,000 per week will be for applicants whose most recent H-1B visa was issued by U.S. Mission Canada with an issuance date of January 1, 2020, through April 1, 2023, and approximately 2,000 per week will be for applicants whose most recent H-1B visa was issued by U.S. Mission India with an issuance date of February 1, 2021, through September 30, 2021. Participation in the pilot program is voluntary. DOS said that individuals who do not meet the requirements for participation in the pilot program, or those who choose not […]

Rapid-Fire Wednesdays Q&A | Cost Containment on Green Card Sponsorship | 12/11/2024 Recap

The transcript version of our weekly Q&A livestream for corporate immigration professionals By Kimberley (Best) Robidoux & Miki Kawashima Matrician 🔥 Question: What are the key trends in green card sponsorship policies under the potential impact of a Trump 2.0 administration? Response: Companies are considering changes to their green card sponsorship programs due to concerns about increased costs and stricter regulatory scrutiny. Discussions with our benchmarking collective revealed that many global mobility professionals are reevaluating tenure requirements and cost containment measures. These trends highlight the growing need for strategic adjustments in green card policies. 🔥 Question: How does the benchmarking collective provide value to HR and global mobility professionals? Response: Our collective gathers insights directly from professionals in the field rather than relying on third-party information. Members benefit from personalized benchmarking reports tailored to their company’s data. Roundtables, both virtual and in-person, foster robust discussions where professionals exchange ideas, share experiences, and build networks, making the community a valuable resource for addressing immigration challenges. 🔥 Question: What tenure requirements are common for initiating the green card process? Response: Survey results showed that 37% of companies initiate the green card process on a case-by-case basis, while 24% start after 12 months […]