Rapid-Fire Wednesdays Q&A | Impact of Recent U.S. Supreme Court Rulings | 1/22/2025 Recap

Jan 23, 2025 | Immigration Updates

The transcript version of our weekly Q&A livestream for corporate immigration professionals. Join our Immigration News Digest Newsletter for more immigration updates.

By Kimberley (Best) Robidoux & Miki Kawashima Matrician

🔥 Question: What is the significance of the Bouarfa v. Mayorkas case for immigration professionals?

Response: In December, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the Bouarfa v. Mayorkas case that federal courts cannot review visa revocations, which are under the discretion of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The ruling clarified that if a statute mandates USCIS to approve or deny a case based on specific criteria, the denial can be challenged in federal court. However, if the decision is discretionary, such as in visa revocations, the court has no authority to intervene.

This decision underscores the finality of DHS’s discretion, leaving applicants with limited recourse—primarily refiling applications while addressing any issues causing revocation, provided those reasons are known. The implications extend to both family-based and employment-based immigration cases, as the same principles apply to visa petition revocations.

🔥 Question: How does this case impact employment-based immigration cases?

Response: For employment-based cases, if an employer’s immigrant visa petition is denied, the denial can still be challenged in court. However, once the petition is approved, any subsequent revocation of the petition or denial of an adjustment of status application is discretionary and cannot be contested in federal court. This could have significant consequences, such as employees losing their ability to remain in the U.S. or employers losing essential staff.

🔥 Question: What does the Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo case mean for immigration policy?

Response: The Supreme Court’s decision in the Loper Bright case, issued in mid-2024, overturned the 1984 Chevron precedent, which required courts to defer to federal agencies’ reasonable interpretations of statutes. This shift puts decision-making power back into the courts and away from federal agencies, marking a move toward deregulation.

🔥 Question: How might Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo positively impact employment-based immigration?

Response: For employers sponsoring visas, this ruling could empower them to challenge denials in court without deference being given to DHS’s interpretation of regulations. This is especially relevant in light of restrictive policies that may emerge under an administration with anti-immigrant tendencies.

Beyond employment-based immigration, Loper-Bright also benefits individuals in removal proceedings. Federal courts can now overturn negative Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decisions that previously infringed on due process rights. Justice Gorsuch’s concurring opinion highlighted the case’s potential to undo many of these unfavorable decisions.

🔥 Question: Are there risks for programs created by federal agencies?

Response: Yes. Programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), H4 Employment Authorization Documents (EADs), and STEM OPT extensions, which were established through agency regulation rather than statute, may face challenges. Anti-immigrant plaintiffs could potentially contest these programs in court under the new legal framework.

For example, while the D.C. Circuit Court upheld the H4 EAD program in 2024, similar programs might not withstand future legal challenges. Any disruptions to these work authorization programs could significantly impact employers and employees reliant on them.

🔥 Question: Could this lead to more immigration-related lawsuits?

Response: Likely. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson cautioned about a potential “tsunami of lawsuits” against federal agencies. On the positive side, this may compel DHS to settle cases more quickly, as seen during the previous administration when corporate immigration attorneys sued USCIS frequently.

Send us your questions via DM or using the below link!

HR Question Submission Form | Rapid-Fire Wednesdays

See you next week!

Related Posts:

June 2022 Visa Bulletin

The Department of State has issued its June 2022 Visa Bulletin, and the most notable update is a significant advancement in the India EB-2 final action dates, which will advance by a full year to September 1, 2014. There is little movement in the final action dates for most other employment-based preference categories. Final action dates remain unchanged from May 2022 for China EB-2, and India and China EB-3. All other countries under EB-2 and EB-3 will remain current, and EB-1 also remains current for all countries including India and China. There is also little movement in the dates for filing chart, although USCIS has announced that the final action dates chart must be used in June, which is a change from prior months, and, for Indian nationals, means that anyone with a priority date of September 1, 2014 or earlier will be eligible to file an adjustment of status in June. For EB-5 cases, the June visa bulletin combined the unreserved direct (C5 and T5) with the pre-Regional Center lapse categories (R5 and I5) and established a final action date of November 11, 2015 and application filing date of December 15, 2015 for mainland China, due to sufficient demand […]

Immigration Update

In this edition, find the latest news on the effects of a potential government shutdown, the October Visa Bulletin, USCIS’ DACA update, and more! Potential Government Shutdown Effect on Immigration Agencies There has been much speculation in the news that the federal government is headed for a shutdown starting October 1, 2023, if Democrats and Republicans fail to agree on annual spending or reach a continuing resolution to temporarily fund the federal government. When this has happened in the past, the contingency plans for each federal agency have varied. The White House keeps an updated page on its website with each agency’s plan for a federal government shutdown. Here is an overview of the immigration agencies: It is important to check each agency’s contingency plan as the situation unfolds because as mentioned, shutdown operations have varied with each presidential administration. Details:  Back to Top October 2023 Visa Bulletin is Published On September 15, 2023, the Department of State released the October 2023 Visa Bulletin, indicating which green card applications are eligible to move forward based on their initial filing date. For employment-based filings, USCIS has directed the public to use “Chart B,” the Dates for Filing chart in the October […]