Navigating Renunciation and Expatriation: What U.S. Citizens Living Abroad Need to Know

Apr 1, 2025 | Investor Visas

By: Bernard Wolfsdorf, Esq. and Avi Friedman, Esq.

For U.S. citizens living abroad, especially those who have never resided in the United States, the discovery that they are required to file annual tax returns and may owe significant taxes to the IRS can be a shocking reality. Often, these individuals are labeled as “accidental citizens,” and while they may have no personal connection to the U.S., the law generally requires them to adhere to the same tax obligations as U.S. residents.

When these “accidental citizens” realize they are potentially liable for large tax debts, their only option may seem to be expatriation. However, the process of expatriating or renouncing U.S. citizenship—can be more complicated than anticipated. In this blog post, we break down the concepts of expatriation and renunciation, explain the legal requirements, and discuss how individuals in this situation can navigate the process.

Expatriation vs. Renunciation: What’s the Difference?

It’s important to understand that expatriation and renunciation are two separate, yet related legal concepts. They both involve the loss of U.S. citizenship, but they differ in the methods through which that loss occurs.

1. Expatriation: A Broader Concept

Expatriation refers to the voluntary or involuntary loss of U.S. citizenship. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (Section 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act), a U.S. citizen may lose their nationality by performing specific acts with the intent to relinquish.  It can happen in several ways, including:

  • Naturalization in another country: If a U.S. citizen becomes a naturalized citizen of another country, they may lose their U.S. citizenship.
  • Oath of allegiance to another country: Taking an oath of allegiance to a foreign state can be grounds for expatriation.
  • Serving in a foreign military: In some cases, serving in the armed forces of a foreign country can lead to expatriation.
  • Renunciation: While formal renunciation is one form of expatriation, it is specifically a voluntary action to give up U.S. citizenship.  Expatriation can occur through renunciation but can also result from other actions if done with the intent to relinquish U.S. nationality.

Thus, expatriation is a broader term that covers multiple actions that lead to the loss of U.S. nationality, and renunciation is simply one of the specific methods.

2. Renunciation: The Formal Process of Voluntary Expatriation

Renunciation, in contrast, is a formal, procedural process by which a U.S. citizen voluntarily gives up their citizenship, rather than an inferred intent from conduct.

This process must meet several requirements:

  • In-person action: The renunciation must be done in person at a U.S. embassy or consulate located abroad.
  • Official procedure: The renunciation must be done in front of a U.S. consular or diplomatic officer, and the individual must sign an Oath of Renunciation (Form DS-4080).
  • Full understanding: The individual must be fully aware of the consequences of renouncing their citizenship, as it is an irrevocable act unless proven to have been done under duress or without proper understanding.

While expatriation can result from actions like naturalization or military service, renunciation is a formal, intentional process that requires legal documentation and a clear demonstration of intent.

Key Differences Between Expatriation and Renunciation

FeatureExpatriationRenunciation
DefinitionLoss of U.S. nationality voluntarily or involuntarilyA formal process of voluntarily giving up U.S. citizenship
MethodOccurs through various acts (e.g., naturalization, military service, etc.)Requires a formal declaration before a U.S. consular officer
Intent RequirementIntent to relinquish citizenship must be proven in some casesExplicit intent expressed through the renunciation process
LocationCan occur anywhereMust be done outside the U.S. at a embassy or consulate
ReversibilityGenerally irreversible unless lack of intent is provenIrrevocable unless proven to be coerced or made under duress

Why Accidental U.S. Citizens Might Consider Renunciation

For many individuals born in the U.S. to foreign parents, expatriation may be a desirable option, especially if they have no connection to the U.S. However, the tax implications can be severe, particularly for those who are not aware of their U.S. tax obligations. U.S. citizens, even if they have never lived in the country, are subject to U.S. taxes on their global income—a policy that can be financially burdensome for those who have only lived in another country.

If a person discovers that they owe the IRS significant back taxes, the only option to resolve this may be to prove that they have expatriated (i.e., renounced their citizenship). The process is retroactive, meaning that renunciation can absolve them from past tax liabilities that stem from their U.S. citizenship status.

Important Considerations: You Can’t Renounce to Avoid Taxes

It’s also important to note that renouncing U.S. citizenship solely to avoid taxes is not allowed under U.S. law. If a person renounces their citizenship and the U.S. government determines that the intent behind their renunciation was to evade taxes, they may be deemed inadmissible to the United States. This means that after renouncing, they could be barred from entering the country in the future, a critical factor to consider before proceeding with renunciation.

The Bottom Line: Renunciation Is a Tricky Process

Navigating the complexities of expatriation and renunciation can be tricky, especially for U.S. accidental citizens who are unfamiliar with the intricacies of U.S. immigration, tax law and citizenship policies. While renouncing U.S. citizenship might free individuals from tax obligations, it is not a decision that should be taken lightly.

If you’re in this position and considering renunciation, it’s crucial to understand the legal process, the potential consequences, and how it will affect your long-term future including ability to travel to the U.S. Consulting with a tax professional and an immigration attorney who focus on renunciation is critical to help ensure that you make an informed decision that aligns with your goals and circumstances.

Renunciation is a formal and irreversible act under U.S. law, so make sure you understand the ramifications fully before proceeding.

WR Immigration is a full-service immigration law firm known worldwide for its unmatched excellence in providing top-quality U.S. immigration representation. To schedule a consultation to discuss your case, please contact us here.

Related Posts:

EB-1 To Become Current in October 2018 Again for China and India – Is the Extraordinary Ability Visa the Best Option for Chinese Nationals?

By: Joseph Barnett Mr. Charlie Oppenheim, Chief of the Visa Control and Reporting Division within the U.S. Department of State (“DOS”), recently noted that the Final Action Date (“FAD”) for China employment-based first-preference (“EB-1”) will become current again at the beginning of Fiscal Year 2019, on October 1, 2018.  This is encouraging news, as this visa category has been subject to an FAD since April 2018 and those with approved I-140 petitions have not been able to move forward with immigrant visa processing.  Once current, visas become immediately available to those with approved I-140 petitions. U.S. immigration law offers an avenue to a green card for foreign nationals with extraordinary ability in science, arts, education, business, or athletics through sustained national or international acclaim who are coming to the U.S. to continue to work in their field of endeavor through EB-1A visa classification.  The biggest advantages of EB-1A classification are that (1) no job offer or permanent job position is required; (2) no labor certification is required; (3) self-petitions are allowed; and (4) premium processing is available for USCIS decisions within 15 days. With the China EB-5 visa backlog reaching unreasonable lengths, the EB-1A visa category has become a popular immigrant visa option […]

3 Things We Like, and 3 Things We Don’t Like, About USCIS’ New EB-5 Guidance

By:  Bernard Wolfsdorf and Joseph Barnett Yesterday USCIS released new guidance on the EB-5 Visa which updates the adjudication policy on issues related to Form I-526 and Form I-829 petitions.  In particular, the new guidance attempted to clarify the “at risk” requirements for Form I-526 approval and the “sustainment” requirement for Form I-829 approval.  We blogged on the specifics yesterday, and now we’ve had time to digest the changes. Here are 3 things we like, and 3 things we don’t like, about USCIS’ new guidance: Things We Like USCIS Policy Now Consistent with EB-5 Regulations. Applicable regulations indicate that a Form I-829 must be accompanied by evidence that the EB-5 investor “in good faith, substantially met the capital investment requirement of the statute and continuously maintained his or her capital investment over the two years of conditional residence.”  USCIS has now clarified its policy to be consistent with the regulations:  “The sustainment period is the investor’s 2 years of conditional permanent resident status. USCIS reviews the investor’s evidence to ensure sustainment of the investment for 2 years from the date the investor obtained conditional permanent residence. An investor does not need to maintain his or her investment beyond the sustainment period.” USCIS Shows Understanding of Reality of […]