Modernization Updates to the H-1B Visa Program

Dec 20, 2024 | Immigration Updates

On December 17, 2024, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) released significant updates to the H-1B visa program, aimed at modernizing the system, clarifying procedure, and codifying longstanding policy.  These updates refine key aspects of the H-1B program to improve clarity, ensure compliance, and streamline processes for employers and beneficiaries alike.

Among the major changes are clarified definitions for specialty occupations, requirements for when amended petitions must be filed, and updates to H-1B cap exemptions. For example, to qualify for H-1B status, the requisite academic degree must be directly related to the H-1B position duties.  Additional measures focus on reinforcing H-1B program integrity, including codified authority for the government to conduct H-1B site visits and stricter criteria for the placement of H-1B workers at third-party worksites.  The rule codifies USCIS’s policy of deference to prior approvals, meaning that officers should defer to the fact that an H-1B petition was previously approved unless there have been changes that could impact the H-1B status.

The revisions also introduce greater flexibility, such as extending the validity period for H-1B cap adjudications beyond October 1st for students transitioning to H-1B status. This would permit larger “cap gaps” so that individuals with F-1 status would not have to stop working if the H-1B petition has not been approved by October 1st. Other updates, including new guidelines for beneficiary-owned entities and bona fide job offers, highlight USCIS’s focus on ensuring that the H-1B program remains both effective and responsive to the evolving labor market.

Key points in the rule include:

  1. Specialty Occupation Definition: Clarification and codification of the specialty occupation standard, requiring a direct connection between the required degree and the duties of the position.
  1. Amended Petitions: Petitioners must file an amended or new petition for material changes in employment terms, including changes in the place of employment outside of the MSA prior to the change taking place.
  1. Deference Policy: USCIS will defer to prior determinations of eligibility unless there was a material error, change in circumstances, or new information impacting eligibility.
  1. Evidence of Maintenance of Status: Petitioners must provide evidence that the beneficiary maintained their nonimmigrant status before filing for an extension or amendment.
  1. Elimination of Itinerary Requirement: Removal of the itinerary requirement for H programs.
  1. Validity Period Adjustments: Allowing H-1B petitions to be approved or extended if adjudicated after the initially requested validity period end-date.
  1. H-1B Cap Exemptions: Revised requirements for qualifying for H-1B cap exemption, including modernized definitions for nonprofit and governmental research organizations.
  1. Automatic Extension of Authorized Employment “Cap-Gap”: Extension of the cap-gap end date from October 1 to April 1 (of the subsequent year) for students changing status to H-1B.
  1. Bona Fide Job Offer: Petitioners must establish a bona fide position in a specialty occupation available for the beneficiary as of the requested start date, and USCIS can request contracts or similar evidence.
  1. Beneficiary-Owned Entities: Initial approval for petitions filed by entities where the beneficiary has a controlling interest is limited to 18 months.
  1. Third-Party Placement: USCIS will consider third-party requirements for the beneficiary’s position in assessing specialty occupation qualifications.
  1. Site Visits and Compliance Reviews: Codification of USCIS’s authority to conduct site visits and take adverse action against non-compliant employers.

Related Posts:

Immigration Update

In this edition, read about a new ruling on DACA applications, challenges faced by the USCIS due to pandemic backlogs, and the Justice Department settling a retaliation claim. New DACA Applications Blocked by Federal Judge New Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) applications will not be allowed under a ruling by a U.S. district judge in Texas on July 16, 2021. The judge ruled that DACA violated the Administrative Procedure Act but temporarily stayed his ruling for the nearly 650,000 current DACA recipients, referred to as “Dreamers.” Current DACA recipients may seek renewal of their authorization to remain and work in the United States. Tech companies, including Twitter, Google, Microsoft, and Adobe, expressed their disappointment with the ruling and urged Congress to protect the program. President Biden echoed those comments and said the U.S. will appeal the ruling, noting that it “relegates hundreds of thousands of young immigrants to an uncertain future.” He said it was his “fervent hope” that Congress would pass legislation to provide a permanent status for DACA recipients. Details: Statement by DHS Secretary Mayorkas on DACA Ruling, July 17, 2021, https://www.dhs.gov/news/2021/07/17/statement-secretary-mayorkas-daca-ruling Back to Top No Surprise: Ombudsman’s Annual Report Says USCIS Faces ‘Unprecedented Challenges’ Due to Pandemic, […]

Immigration Update

In this edition, read about the EB-5 program’s outlook, final action dates advancing in the Visa Bulletin for July, USCIS reports on FY 2022 H-1B cap registration, and more! EB-5 Program Set to Expire June 30, Outlook is Uncertain in Short Term The EB-5 regional center program, under which foreign investors indirectly finance projects in the United States in exchange for green cards, is set to expire on June 30, 2021. Whether Congress will be able to reach agreement on a plan to extend it remains uncertain, at least in the short term. The program’s regional centers have funneled billions of foreign investor dollars into large projects such as City Pier A in Battery Park, New York; Hudson Yards in New York City; and the revitalization of Cleveland, Ohio’s riverfront. A bill proposed by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) would restructure the program. Some in the industry support the proposal as a way of avoiding the program’s expiration, while others support shortening the EB-5 program’s reauthorization period or making other compromises. However, some developers want to make it easier to raise money and indicated they would not support any bill that doesn’t do that. The program has […]