I-829 Processing Times Have Run Amok

Sep 6, 2020 | Investor Visas

USCIS is reporting online that the estimated processing time for a Form I-829 Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status at Immigrant Investor Program Office is now 37 to 248 months.  USCIS is only allowing case inquiries for cases filed before August 6, 2000.  This is preposterous, especially considering that USCIS is required, by regulation, to adjudicate I-829 petitions within 90 days pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 216.6(c).

More and more EB-5 investors are turning to federal courts to challenge the delays in their immigration process, including long-pending Forms I-829.  Frustrated with ongoing uncertainty about their future, as well as the repeated need to obtain proof of one’s legal status in the U.S., these conditional green card holders simply want a final resolution on their EB-5 case – for peace of mind, for naturalization purposes, and/or to receive their EB-5 investment funds back.

WR Immigration has been active in assisting investors stuck in administrative limbo.  In one action against USCIS, we were able to obtain approvals and permanent green cards for all 10 immigrant investors and their derivative beneficiaries within 90 days of filing the complaint in federal court.  While past performance is no guarantee of future results, it is notable that the U.S. government did not want to fight the litigation by filing a motion to dismiss.

If you feel your Form I-829 has been pending for unreasonably long, please contact a WR Immigration attorney to discuss your case.

Related Posts:

October 2023: 5 New Things to Know About EB-5 Immigrant Investor Visas

By: Joseph “Joey” Barnett There has been a lot of activity in EB-5 in the past month, including updated policy guidance by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) and visa processing information from the U.S. Department of State (“DOS”). Here are five new things to know about EB-5 in October 2023. 1. Sustainment Period USCIS issued guidance interpreting the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (the “RIA”) to indicate that, for investors who file the new Form I-526E after the RIA, the sustainment period – the amount of time EB-5 investment capital must remain “at risk” – is only 2 years from the date that “the full amount of qualifying investment is made to the new commercial enterprise and placed at risk under applicable requirements, including being made available to the job creating entity, as appropriate.” This may drastically change the EB-5 market, as USCIS appears to no longer require that the investor sustain their investment throughout the entire conditional residence period, even if the applicable regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 216.6 appear to still require it. For pre-RIA investors, the “sustainment” period remains the first two years of conditional residency. This guidance may be welcomed by some investors […]

Mandamus Lawsuits on Delayed EB-5 Adjudications

By:  Joseph Barnett Writ of mandamus lawsuits against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) are en vogue, and for good reason:  as of December 2, 2019, the estimated time range to process a Form I-526 petition has skyrocketed from 31.5 months to 52 months, and online case inquiries are only accepted for petitions filed before September 7, 2015.  This is just wrong, and a travesty to those who have invested at least $500,000 and paid thousands of dollars more in fees to get their applications processed.  Extended processing times can cause a detrimental effect on those who are patiently (and nervously) waiting in nonimmigrant status for I-526 approval or for those whose children will “age out”, and a writ of mandamus may be necessary to get USCIS to act when its unstated stated goal is to delay, discourage, and deny.  Here are five things to know about lawsuits in federal court on delayed EB-5 adjudications.    USCIS Employee Hours to Process Form I-526 Petitions. When USCIS increased the filing fee for a Form I-526 petition in 2016 from $1,500 to $3,675, it stated the increase would further “efforts with the goal of improving operational efficiencies while enhancing predictability and transparency in the adjudication process.”  It […]