Frustrated with Temporary Green Card Stamps While I-829 Pending? WR Has a Solution for You

Sep 11, 2020 | Investor Visas

USCIS processing of Forms I-829 Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status has taken a turn for the worse, and conditional green card holders are suffering with the bureaucratic challenges that arise from USCIS’ delays, which damage their ability to live in the United States and fully derive the benefits of their conditional lawful permanent residency.  It appears that USCIS has a pattern and practice of delaying adjudications on Forms I-829 in an attempt to make life harder for immigrants and causing some to give up, despite regulations requiring a decision or interview within 90 days of filing.

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP has a solution to compel USCIS to finalize a Form I-829 adjudication within a reasonable amount of time – file a lawsuit in federal court under the Administrative Procedures Act.

USCIS reports on its website the following average processing time on a Form I-829.  Since 2016, processing times have increased nearly 95%.

Fiscal YearProcessing Times in Months
201619.1
201727.7
201827.1
201933.3
202037.2

USCIS now reports processing times of 33 to 59 months for Forms I-829 (though in November 2020 it was up to 234 months!).

The 18-month conditional green card extension issued with a timely filed Form I-829 is insufficient to cover the amount of time it takes USCIS to adjudicate the Form I-829, requiring conditional green card holders to obtain I-551 extension stamps on their passports every year to confirm their U.S. immigration status, which is needed to (a) demonstrate work authorization, (b) renew driver’s licenses, and (c) travel internationally freely.

Obtaining the I-551 extension stamps requires attending a USCIS InfoPass appointment.  During the COVID-19 global pandemic, USCIS has reduced the number of appointments available and even require evidence of a medical or business emergency abroad, despite the fact that it is unlawful under U.S. law to be in the country without unexpired proof of immigration status.

Further, EB-5 investors are able to get their funds repaid after 2 years of conditional residency, but many EB-5 projects have repayment terms upon I-829 approval, subjecting their funds to further risk.  Additionally, for those who wish to become a U.S. citizens, USCIS will not finalize the adjudication of a Form N-400 until the Form I-829 is approved.

USCIS’ delay is not due to lack of agency resources, the number of cases on file, or any provision in the law.  It is an attempt to limit legal immigration and deny green card holders their right to live without restrictions in the United States.  The delay is not justified, and a lawsuit in federal court under the Administrative Procedures Act can push USCIS to make a final decision on a Form I-829.  Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP continues to have success with its lawsuits against USCIS and expects the demand for these cases to rise as USCIS’ delays continue.

Related Posts:

Visa Denials Based on Communist Party Membership

By:  Joseph Barnett Reports from China indicate that the U.S. Consulate General in Guangzhou has recently increased immigrant visa denials based on INA Section 212(a)(3)(D) related to membership in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), despite the fact that such membership is required and involuntary for most to advance in university, business, or employment. These immigrant visa denials have been issued after applicants have been placed in administrative processing under INA Section 221(g) after completing an information sheet related to their employment and education history.  It is critical that visa applicants speak with experienced immigration attorneys prior to submitting a response to the Consulate, as this may be the only time to put forward an argument to the consular officer as to why this ground of inadmissibility does not apply.  For example, the U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual provides relief for members whose membership was “non-meaningful,” as found by the U.S. Supreme Court in Rowoldt v. Pefetto, 355 U.S. 115 (1957) and Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy, 374 U.S. 469 (1963). Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP attorneys have had numerous successes preparing legal briefs to rebut claims of inadmissibility under INA Section 212(a)(3)(D).  Our firm has also obtained waivers for immigrant visa applications by filing […]

Chatting with Charlie Webinar: Unpacking the January 2024 Visa Bulletin

WR Immigration Director of Visa Consulting Charlie Oppenheim, Partner Charina Garcia, and Senior Associate Laura Bloniarz update HR professionals with the latest information from the January 2024 Visa Bulletin. They dive into an analysis of employment-based and family-based immigrant visa categories, 2024 predictions and an extensive Q&A session from live attendees and submitted questions. Watch below!