Frustrated with Temporary Green Card Stamps While I-829 Pending? WR Has a Solution for You

Sep 11, 2020 | Investor Visas

USCIS processing of Forms I-829 Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status has taken a turn for the worse, and conditional green card holders are suffering with the bureaucratic challenges that arise from USCIS’ delays, which damage their ability to live in the United States and fully derive the benefits of their conditional lawful permanent residency.  It appears that USCIS has a pattern and practice of delaying adjudications on Forms I-829 in an attempt to make life harder for immigrants and causing some to give up, despite regulations requiring a decision or interview within 90 days of filing.

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP has a solution to compel USCIS to finalize a Form I-829 adjudication within a reasonable amount of time – file a lawsuit in federal court under the Administrative Procedures Act.

USCIS reports on its website the following average processing time on a Form I-829.  Since 2016, processing times have increased nearly 95%.

Fiscal YearProcessing Times in Months
201619.1
201727.7
201827.1
201933.3
202037.2

USCIS now reports processing times of 33 to 59 months for Forms I-829 (though in November 2020 it was up to 234 months!).

The 18-month conditional green card extension issued with a timely filed Form I-829 is insufficient to cover the amount of time it takes USCIS to adjudicate the Form I-829, requiring conditional green card holders to obtain I-551 extension stamps on their passports every year to confirm their U.S. immigration status, which is needed to (a) demonstrate work authorization, (b) renew driver’s licenses, and (c) travel internationally freely.

Obtaining the I-551 extension stamps requires attending a USCIS InfoPass appointment.  During the COVID-19 global pandemic, USCIS has reduced the number of appointments available and even require evidence of a medical or business emergency abroad, despite the fact that it is unlawful under U.S. law to be in the country without unexpired proof of immigration status.

Further, EB-5 investors are able to get their funds repaid after 2 years of conditional residency, but many EB-5 projects have repayment terms upon I-829 approval, subjecting their funds to further risk.  Additionally, for those who wish to become a U.S. citizens, USCIS will not finalize the adjudication of a Form N-400 until the Form I-829 is approved.

USCIS’ delay is not due to lack of agency resources, the number of cases on file, or any provision in the law.  It is an attempt to limit legal immigration and deny green card holders their right to live without restrictions in the United States.  The delay is not justified, and a lawsuit in federal court under the Administrative Procedures Act can push USCIS to make a final decision on a Form I-829.  Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP continues to have success with its lawsuits against USCIS and expects the demand for these cases to rise as USCIS’ delays continue.

Related Posts:

USCIS Releases Guidance on EB-5 Regional Center Lapse

The EB-5 Immigrant Investor Regional Center Program expires at the end of the day on June 30, 2021, due to a lapse in Congressional authorization to continue the program. USCIS has released the following guidance today:  Alert: Statutory authorization related to the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Regional Center Program will expire at midnight on June 30, 2021, unless Congress reauthorizes it. A lapse in authorization does not affect EB-5 petitions filed by investors who are not seeking a visa under the Regional Center Program. In the event of a lapse in authorization related to the Regional Center Program, we will reject the following forms received on or after July 1, 2021: Form I-924, Application for Regional Center Designation Under the Immigrant Investor Program, except when the application type indicates that it is an amendment to the regional center’s name, organizational structure, ownership, or administration; and   Form I-526, Immigrant Petition by Alien Investor, when it indicates that the petitioner’s investment is associated with an approved regional center. In general, we will not act on any pending petition or application of these form types that is dependent on a lapsed statutory authority until further notice. If you were issued written correspondence regarding your petition or application […]

7 Years for a “Special” Form I-526 Approval

On April 14, 2021, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) approved our former client, Mr.  Zhang’s, Form I-526 – Immigrant Petition by Alien Entrepreneur.  His case had been pending since December 2013.  This is a special Form I-526 approval, as Mr. Zhang was one of the two named plaintiffs in Zhang v. USCIS et al.¸ in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected USCIS’ interpretation of the term “capital” in the EB-5 regulations.  The circuit court held that the term “cash” unambiguously includes the proceeds of third-party loans, stating “Cash is fungible, and it passes from buyer to seller without imposing on the seller any of the buyer’s obligations to his own creditors.”  The court found that USCIS’ position was inconsistent with the regulation and can thus have no legal effect.     USCIS has not officially responded to the Zhang decision.  Mr. Zhang’s Form I-526 approval appears to confirm that USCIS will not be appealing the court’s decision to the U.S. Supreme Court for further review. Despite the five months that have passed since the decision, USCIS’ online Policy Manual regarding the use of loan proceeds as capital has not been updated to reflect it, […]