Frustrated with Temporary Green Card Stamps While I-829 Pending? WR Has a Solution for You

Sep 11, 2020 | Investor Visas

USCIS processing of Forms I-829 Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status has taken a turn for the worse, and conditional green card holders are suffering with the bureaucratic challenges that arise from USCIS’ delays, which damage their ability to live in the United States and fully derive the benefits of their conditional lawful permanent residency.  It appears that USCIS has a pattern and practice of delaying adjudications on Forms I-829 in an attempt to make life harder for immigrants and causing some to give up, despite regulations requiring a decision or interview within 90 days of filing.

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP has a solution to compel USCIS to finalize a Form I-829 adjudication within a reasonable amount of time – file a lawsuit in federal court under the Administrative Procedures Act.

USCIS reports on its website the following average processing time on a Form I-829.  Since 2016, processing times have increased nearly 95%.

Fiscal YearProcessing Times in Months
201619.1
201727.7
201827.1
201933.3
202037.2

USCIS now reports processing times of 33 to 59 months for Forms I-829 (though in November 2020 it was up to 234 months!).

The 18-month conditional green card extension issued with a timely filed Form I-829 is insufficient to cover the amount of time it takes USCIS to adjudicate the Form I-829, requiring conditional green card holders to obtain I-551 extension stamps on their passports every year to confirm their U.S. immigration status, which is needed to (a) demonstrate work authorization, (b) renew driver’s licenses, and (c) travel internationally freely.

Obtaining the I-551 extension stamps requires attending a USCIS InfoPass appointment.  During the COVID-19 global pandemic, USCIS has reduced the number of appointments available and even require evidence of a medical or business emergency abroad, despite the fact that it is unlawful under U.S. law to be in the country without unexpired proof of immigration status.

Further, EB-5 investors are able to get their funds repaid after 2 years of conditional residency, but many EB-5 projects have repayment terms upon I-829 approval, subjecting their funds to further risk.  Additionally, for those who wish to become a U.S. citizens, USCIS will not finalize the adjudication of a Form N-400 until the Form I-829 is approved.

USCIS’ delay is not due to lack of agency resources, the number of cases on file, or any provision in the law.  It is an attempt to limit legal immigration and deny green card holders their right to live without restrictions in the United States.  The delay is not justified, and a lawsuit in federal court under the Administrative Procedures Act can push USCIS to make a final decision on a Form I-829.  Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP continues to have success with its lawsuits against USCIS and expects the demand for these cases to rise as USCIS’ delays continue.

Related Posts:

What Does the December 2021 Visa Bulletin Mean for New “Direct” EB-5 Investors?

The December 2021 Visa Bulletin states that the EB-5 direct visa categories have become “Current” for December 2021, including for nationals born in mainland-China or India or Vietnam.  This means that “direct’ EB-5 investors with Form I-526 approvals at this time can immediately apply for an immigrant visa at a U.S. Consulate or Embassy or adjust status if in the United States and otherwise eligible. However, it is not technically correct to say that there is “no waiting line” for China-mainland direct EB-5, as we do not know what future Visa Bulletins will indicate when a direct I-526 case filed today is eventually approved.  It remains to be seen whether this “current” status will hold, and for how long. Many experts believe this designation of China and India and Vietnam being current for direct cases will not last because its likely the regional center program will be re-authorized soon and then demand will pick up again resulting in massive retrogression for China, Vietnam and possibly India as well. The Visa Bulletin specifically notes that when the EB-5 Regional Center program is reauthorized, there would be significantly more demand for EB-5 visas at that time (in particular for mainland-China):  “If China-mainland […]

Demystifying the Complicated October 2022 Visa Bulletin – What Does it Mean for EB-5 Investors?

The U.S. Department of State (“DOS”) recently released the October 2022 Visa Bulletin, and it showed two new developments for EB-5 investors: (1) priority date retrogression of the 5th Unreserved Final Action Date (“FAD”) for China-mainland born from December 22, 2015 to March 22, 2015, and (2) creation of a 5th Unreserved FAD for India of November 8, 2019. The FAD has remained current for all other countries in the EB-5 Unreserved categories, and for all countries in the EB-5 “Set-Aside” categories. USCIS also announced that it will accept employment-based adjustment of status applications with priority dates that are earlier than the Dates for Filing (“DFF”) listed in the Department of State’s October Visa Bulletin. The 5th Unreserved DFF is January 1, 2016 for China-mainland born and is December 8, 2019 for India. For Indian nationals in the United States, this will not prevent many from applying for adjustment of status because nearly all Form I-526s were filed before the now-vacated EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization regulations that became effective date on November 21, 2019. For China-mainland EB-5 investors abroad, however, the large retrogression is surprising, especially given the amount of visa numbers available in FYs 2021 and 2022 that […]