EB-5 Project Due Diligence, After the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022

Nov 7, 2022 | Investor Visas

EB-5 is a job creation program, with an immigration benefit.  The full immigration benefit does not come unless the job creation occurs first.  From both an immigration and financial/investment perspective, it is critical that immigrant investors perform due diligence on EB-5 projects in the market.  With the passage of the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (“RIA”) of 2022 and long-term stability in the EB-5 Program, there is reinvigorated interest in this program.  And while some aspects of EB-5 due diligence haven’t changed, the RIA establishes new considerations for prospective EB-5 investors.  We detail some below:

  • Priority Processing: The RIA states that USCIS “shall prioritize the processing and adjudication of petitions for rural areas” but does provide further detail, and to date, USCIS has not provided any clarity on this matter.  This is separate from “expedited processing,” which could always be granted based on specific personal (or potentially EB-5 project related) considerations.  Read WR Immigration’s blog on Expedited Processing
  • Reserved Visas: The RIA “reserves” a percentage of available EB-5 visas each year for new investments in qualifying rural or high unemployment areas or infrastructure projects to provide an incentive for a quicker green card for nationals from countries like China, Vietnam, and India who would otherwise be stuck in a visa backlog.  As of today, these “reserved” visa categories are “current,” allowing for “concurrent” adjustment of status filings but those lawfully in the United States.  Read WR Immigration EB-5 Partner Joey Barnett’s in-depth article published in the Regional Center Business Journal for more information on this topic.  Note, just because an investor’s priority date is current at the time of I-526E filing does not mean that he/she will not be subject to a visa backlog or the establishment of a final action date at some point.
  • Job Creation: The RIA limits the number of indirect and induced jobs estimated to be created by a new commercial enterprise or job creating entity to 90%, and to 75% if construction lasts under 2 years, and economists will need to make adjustments to job creation figures in the economic reports.   While few industries in the U.S., have an (indirect + induced) job threshold as high as 90% relative to the total size of the total multiplier (direct + indirect + induced) effect, this becomes a more important consideration if construction is under 24 months. 
  • Fund Administration: An entire section of the RIA relates to “Fund Administration,” one of the law’s biggest “integrity” measures.  It requires, unless otherwise waived by USCIS, each new commercial enterprise to retain an independent fund administrator to monitor, track, approve, and verify fund transfers of EB-5 capital.  Immigrant investors may wish to ensure that the fund administrator is truly independent and has authority for access to information and accounts. 
  • Regional Center Terminations: The RIA does provide some cover for immigrant investors who invested in a project associated with a Regional Center that is terminated due to failure to promote economic growth, provide annual information and certifications, or comply with the RIA’s integrity measures, among other reasons.  However, it is still important to ensure the Regional Center has complied with its responsibilities to USCIS and to the sponsored new commercial enterprise, and that the new commercial enterprise is ready to act in the event the regional center is terminated by USCIS.

Related Posts:

BELGIUM: Immigration reform aims to expedite single permit application processing

Summary of the Issue – After much lobbying, the Belgian government is taking actions to reform the single permit application process with the goal of improving processing timeframes. Implemented on January 1, 2019, the single permit application allows non-EU employees to work in multiple branches of an EU-based multinational company. The single permit replaced a two-sided process for obtaining residence and work permits each with their own rules and procedures. Policy Reform – The reforms focuses on increasing the number of immigration bureaucrats, streamlining internal processes, and taking advantage of technology efficiencies. Impact – Upon implementation, the reforms promise to expedite immigration processing by allowing single permit holders (including first-time applicants, renewal applicants, and those changing employers) to start or continue employment upon approval of regional authorities.  First-time applicants must still obtain approval from federal authorities, but can begin working upon approval from local authorities. More Information – “Single Permit as of January 1, 2019 – AN Analysis” “Single Permit Application Procedure”

7 Things We Learned from New EB-5 Program Chief Sarah M. Kendall

By: Joseph Barnett Earlier this week, new Immigrant Investor Program Office Chief Sarah Kendall addressed the EB-5 community at the AILA/IIUSA EB-5 Industry Forum in Chicago, Illinois. We are happy to see this type of engagement by USCIS and are hopeful for continued dialogue to address the concerns of immigrant investors and regional centers. Here are seven things we learned from Ms. Kendall: 1. Minor Investors Ms. Kendall confirmed there is no age limit for minors filing as the principal investors but indicated that USCIS will continue to look at issues of contractual capacity and voidability of investment contracts. 2. Bridge Financing Ms. Kendall indicated it was difficult to provide specific guidance on the issue of bridge financing because of the “diversity of work and financial arrangements and structures.” She noted that the term of the loan, by itself, does not disqualify financing as a bridge loan that would receive credit for job creation purposed and that USCIS will look at interim nature of loan and contemplation of future receipt of EB-5 (or other) capital to repay the bridge financing. This is inconsistent with language in RFEs previously issued by USCIS. Additional guidance clarifying this important issue is required to provide certainty for […]