E Visa Update – December 2022 – New Domicile Requirements

Dec 19, 2022 | Announcements, Investor Visas

For an in-depth look at this topic and other E-2 Visa strategies, register for WR Immigration’s Jan. 19, 2023, webinar.

By Joey Barnett, Partner, WR Immigration

On December 15, 2022, Congress substantially changed E Visa eligibility, in particular for those who have used Citizenship by Investment program of countries to acquire citizenship in a treaty visa country. It appears President Joe Biden will pass this provision into law by end of year as part of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023.

Now, an E visa applicant must be domiciled in that country of citizenship for “a continuous period of not less than 3 years at any point before applying for an E nonimmigrant visa.” 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E), which defines the E visa class, now states (with emphasis on the new provision):

An alien entitled to enter the United States under and in pursuance of the provisions of a treaty of commerce and navigation between the United States and the foreign state of which he is a national, or, in the case of an alien who acquired the relevant nationality through a financial investment and who has not previously been granted status under this subparagraph, the foreign state of which the alien is a national and in which the alien has been domiciled for a continuous period of not less than 3 years at any point before applying for a nonimmigrant visa under this subparagraph, and the spouse and children of any such alien if accompanying or following to join him; (i) solely to carry on substantial trade, including trade in services or trade in technology, principally between the United States and the foreign state of which he is a national; (ii) solely to develop and direct the operations of an enterprise in which he has invested, or of an enterprise in which he is actively in the process of investing, a substantial amount of capital.”

This residency requirement does not apply to individuals who has previously been granted E nonimmigrant status.

WR Immigration Partner Joey Barnett will be discussing this important new requirement and other E-2 treaty visa issues with Patrick Findaro of Visa Franchise on January 19, 2023.  Register now>> 

He will also be on WR Immigration’s next edition of “Chatting with Charlie Oppenheim” on January 10, 2023 to discuss the EB-5 Investor Visa Outlook for 2023.  Register now>>

Related Posts:

Direct EB-5 Due Diligence: Buyer Beware (and Immigration Attorneys Be Cautious)

Authored by Joseph Barnett and Bernard Wolfsdorf, on behalf of AILA EB-5 Committee There has been a lot of recent interest from prospective immigrant investors in direct EB-5, including “pooled direct” investments.  This is partially because the more popular EB-5 Regional Center program is waiting for reauthorization, and the (likely temporary) minimum investment requirement presently at $500,000 for job creation in a Targeted Employment Area (“TEA”).[1]  As a result, the AILA EB-5 Committee would like to share their thoughts on specific issues related to the representation of direct EB-5 clients, as a high percentage of direct EB-5 cases appear to run into difficulties. Limited Scope of Representation.  As lawyers, we can rely on outside professionals (such as accountants and business advisors) to provide advice in areas we are not competent to handle. Being a good immigration lawyer and advising clients regarding investor visas does not require that every lawyer handling these cases must be competent in the tax, business, and accounting work that is a critical part of the EB-5 framework. It is correct to state that EB-5 requires a team including the immigration lawyers, corporate lawyers, franchise lawyers, securities lawyer, business plan writer, accountant, banker, and the list goes […]

Read More

Despite House Decriminalization of Marijuana, Pot for Immigrants Remains a No-No

The U.S. House of Representatives recently joined many states by voting to decriminalize marijuana via legislation that would remove cannabis from the list of scheduled substances under the Controlled Substances Act and eliminate criminal penalties for individuals who manufacture, distribute, or possess marijuana. The “Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act” would also expunge nonviolent federal marijuana convictions, among other things. Bill sponsor Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said that federal action on the issue “would follow the growing recognition in the states that the status quo is unacceptable.” Other House Democrats also are saying that decriminalization is long overdue. Some see it as a racial justice issue, such as Reps. Barbara Lee (D-CA), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), and Jim Clyburn (D-SC). The latter noted that people of color are four times more likely to be arrested for cannabis possession than white people and are more likely to receive longer and harsher sentences. Advocates for decriminalization aren’t celebrating yet, however, since the bill is not likely to pass the current Senate. Republicans have warned about the early release of criminals and a potential uptick in driver impairment. Future control of the Senate remains unclear; prospects for a similar bill in the next […]

Read More