The Supreme Court issued an important decision today in cases challenging President Trump’s Executive Order on birthright citizenship. The Court limited its decision to federal courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions, allowing the government to move forward with implementation of the Order, but leaving open the possibility of legal challenges to the Order and its implementation. Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the majority opinion, which did not address whether President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship is constitutional. The Court focused its decision on the procedures federal courts must follow, and the orders federal courts can issue, when states and citizens challenge actions of the federal government. The Court’s decision today means there will be continuing and evolving legal challenges to the birthright citizenship order in the federal courts. Nationwide Injunctions Generally, the Court limited federal courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions to executive orders and broad national policies. It explained that courts should normally only block federal policies for the individuals or organizations that bring a lawsuit, unless a statute or class action process allows broader relief. This ruling makes it less likely that a single lawsuit will be able to stop a federal policy from taking effect across the entire country. […]