Client Payment Portal

Despite House Decriminalization of Marijuana, Pot for Immigrants Remains a No-No

Nov 12, 2020 | Investor Visas

The U.S. House of Representatives recently joined many states by voting to decriminalize marijuana via legislation that would remove cannabis from the list of scheduled substances under the Controlled Substances Act and eliminate criminal penalties for individuals who manufacture, distribute, or possess marijuana. The “Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act” would also expunge nonviolent federal marijuana convictions, among other things.

Bill sponsor Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said that federal action on the issue “would follow the growing recognition in the states that the status quo is unacceptable.” Other House Democrats also are saying that decriminalization is long overdue. Some see it as a racial justice issue, such as Reps. Barbara Lee (D-CA), Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), and Jim Clyburn (D-SC). The latter noted that people of color are four times more likely to be arrested for cannabis possession than white people and are more likely to receive longer and harsher sentences.

Advocates for decriminalization aren’t celebrating yet, however, since the bill is not likely to pass the current Senate. Republicans have warned about the early release of criminals and a potential uptick in driver impairment. Future control of the Senate remains unclear; prospects for a similar bill in the next session could improve depending on the outcome of the Georgia runoffs in January 2021.

Why is Marijuana Still a No-No for Noncitizens?

The most important thing for non-U.S. citizens to remember is that although many states have legalized marijuana to varying degrees, it remains illegal at the federal level. Indeed, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued new policy guidance in 2019 to clarify that violations of federal controlled substance law, including those involving marijuana, are generally a bar to establishing good moral character for naturalization.

Moreover, such use may render a green card holder inadmissible and possibly removable from the United States. Although USCIS appears to except “simple possession of 30g or less of marijuana” from the list of conditional bars to “good moral character,” U.S. immigration law generally is extremely harsh on this issue, even with respect to medical use. Foreign nationals therefore should avoid carrying marijuana or a medical marijuana card, and avoid related postings on social media or any other activity that could raise red flags with immigration officers. Those who think they may have marijuana-related issues or who have worked in the industry should get legal counsel before leaving the United States or applying for immigration status.

Contact your WR attorney for advice in specific situations.

More info:

Related Posts:

EB-5 Project Due Diligence, After the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022

EB-5 is a job creation program, with an immigration benefit.  The full immigration benefit does not come unless the job creation occurs first.  From both an immigration and financial/investment perspective, it is critical that immigrant investors perform due diligence on EB-5 projects in the market.  With the passage of the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (“RIA”) of 2022 and long-term stability in the EB-5 Program, there is reinvigorated interest in this program.  And while some aspects of EB-5 due diligence haven’t changed, the RIA establishes new considerations for prospective EB-5 investors.  We detail some below:

Read More

3 Things We Like, and 3 Things We Don’t Like, About USCIS’ New EB-5 Guidance

By:  Bernard Wolfsdorf and Joseph Barnett Yesterday USCIS released new guidance on the EB-5 Visa which updates the adjudication policy on issues related to Form I-526 and Form I-829 petitions.  In particular, the new guidance attempted to clarify the “at risk” requirements for Form I-526 approval and the “sustainment” requirement for Form I-829 approval.  We blogged on the specifics yesterday, and now we’ve had time to digest the changes. Here are 3 things we like, and 3 things we don’t like, about USCIS’ new guidance: Things We Like USCIS Policy Now Consistent with EB-5 Regulations. Applicable regulations indicate that a Form I-829 must be accompanied by evidence that the EB-5 investor “in good faith, substantially met the capital investment requirement of the statute and continuously maintained his or her capital investment over the two years of conditional residence.”  USCIS has now clarified its policy to be consistent with the regulations:  “The sustainment period is the investor’s 2 years of conditional permanent resident status. USCIS reviews the investor’s evidence to ensure sustainment of the investment for 2 years from the date the investor obtained conditional permanent residence. An investor does not need to maintain his or her investment beyond the sustainment period.” USCIS Shows Understanding of Reality of […]

Read More