Client Payment Portal

Demystifying the Complicated October 2022 Visa Bulletin – What Does it Mean for EB-5 Investors?

Sep 19, 2022 | Investor Visas

The U.S. Department of State (“DOS”) recently released the October 2022 Visa Bulletin, and it showed two new developments for EB-5 investors: (1) priority date retrogression of the 5th Unreserved Final Action Date (“FAD”) for China-mainland born from December 22, 2015 to March 22, 2015, and (2) creation of a 5th Unreserved FAD for India of November 8, 2019. The FAD has remained current for all other countries in the EB-5 Unreserved categories, and for all countries in the EB-5 “Set-Aside” categories.

USCIS also announced that it will accept employment-based adjustment of status applications with priority dates that are earlier than the Dates for Filing (“DFF”) listed in the Department of State’s October Visa Bulletin. The 5th Unreserved DFF is January 1, 2016 for China-mainland born and is December 8, 2019 for India.

For Indian nationals in the United States, this will not prevent many from applying for adjustment of status because nearly all Form I-526s were filed before the now-vacated EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization regulations that became effective date on November 21, 2019.

For China-mainland EB-5 investors abroad, however, the large retrogression is surprising, especially given the amount of visa numbers available in FYs 2021 and 2022 that have gone unused by EB-5 investors, as it means that the U.S. Consulate in Guangzhou will not issue visas to those who had not filed Form I-526s before March 22, 2015. This occurred because DOS determined the previous date (December 22, 2015) would have allowed more applicants be eligible for interview than visa numbers authorized for 5th Unreserved FAD for China-mainland, which has been impacted by (a) the lower FY 2023 employment limit of approximately 200,000 from FY 2022’s 281,507, and (b) a 32% reduction of the number of visas made available to EB-5 investors who filed before the 2022 EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (“RIA”) was enacted due to the “Reserved Visa” provisions. For a detailed analysis on the impacts of these provisions, review the blog featured by Invest in the USA.

Further, it is unlikely that DOS will advance the 5th Unreserved FAD for China-mainland in the foreseeable future unless DOS determines it can start using the otherwise unused Rest of World (“ROW”) numbers, which would occur in the second half of the fiscal year after determining ROW demand.

*Special thanks to WR Immigration Partner and AILA member Joseph Barnett for his assistance in drafting this update.

Related Posts:

U.S. District Court provides recourse to FY 2020 Diversity Visa lottery winners; Expedited green card appointments available at consulates

About the Diversity Lottery:  Section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) provides for a class of immigrants known as “diversity immigrants” from countries with historically low rates of immigration to the United States.  For Fiscal Year 2020, 50,000 Diversity Visas (DVs) will be available. The Department of State determines selectees through a randomized computer drawing. The Department of State distributes diversity visas among six geographic regions, and no single country may receive more than 7 percent of the available DVs in any one year. For DV-2020, natives of certain countries are not eligible to apply, because more than 50,000 natives of these countries immigrated to the United States in the previous five years. President Trump’s Travel Ban on Immigrants: On Wednesday, April 22, President Trump signed a proclamation suspending entry into the United States of certain immigrants who present risk to the U.S. labor market during the economic recovery following the COVID-19 outbreak. The proclamation was effective at 11:59 p.m. EDT on Thursday, April 23. It was continued by President Trump on June 22, and will expire on December 31, 2020, unless continued. Applicants for immigrant visas covered by the proclamation, including ​Diversity Visa 2020 (DV-2020) applicants, who have not been issued an immigrant visa as […]

Read More

Mandamus Lawsuits on Delayed EB-5 Adjudications

By:  Joseph Barnett Writ of mandamus lawsuits against U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) are en vogue, and for good reason:  as of December 2, 2019, the estimated time range to process a Form I-526 petition has skyrocketed from 31.5 months to 52 months, and online case inquiries are only accepted for petitions filed before September 7, 2015.  This is just wrong, and a travesty to those who have invested at least $500,000 and paid thousands of dollars more in fees to get their applications processed.  Extended processing times can cause a detrimental effect on those who are patiently (and nervously) waiting in nonimmigrant status for I-526 approval or for those whose children will “age out”, and a writ of mandamus may be necessary to get USCIS to act when its unstated stated goal is to delay, discourage, and deny.  Here are five things to know about lawsuits in federal court on delayed EB-5 adjudications.    USCIS Employee Hours to Process Form I-526 Petitions. When USCIS increased the filing fee for a Form I-526 petition in 2016 from $1,500 to $3,675, it stated the increase would further “efforts with the goal of improving operational efficiencies while enhancing predictability and transparency in the adjudication process.”  It […]

Read More