Creating a Path to Citizenship: Update on President Biden’s Legislative Proposal for Immigration Reform

Sep 10, 2021 | Immigration Updates

Within his first 100 days of office, President Biden introduced a 353-page comprehensive immigration reform bill that would provide a path to citizenship to undocumented children, address the root causes of migration, make efforts to responsibly manage the southern border, reform the immigrant visa system, and serve other goals. But what are the odds that President Biden’s ambitious plans for immigration reform will pass and become enacted into law? Given narrow party divisions in the House and Senate, large-scale immigration reform has been historically difficult to push through Congress.  Piecemeal legislation has a much higher chance of surviving the legislative process.

At present, lawmakers are focused on incorporating a pathway to citizenship into President Biden’s multitrillion dollar reconciliation package under consideration by Congress. The budget plan, which passed in the House of Representatives in late August, includes provisions to facilitate legal permanent residency for undocumented children, Temporary Protected Status (TPS) holders, and farmworkers.  It also earmarks $107 billion for immigration and border security. However, special rules restrict the type of measures that can be passed as part of budget reconciliation, and it is uncertain whether language concerning immigration reform will remain intact.   

Senate Democrats will be meeting with the Senate Parliamentarian today to recommend that a pathway to citizenship be included in the spending package. The Senate Parliamentarian and former immigration lawyer, Elizabeth MacDonough, will deliberate on whether or not the provision currently written into the reconciliation package complies with budget rules and will be allowed. If Senate Democrats are not able to make their case effectively, the parliamentarian could remove language from the bill that would have expanded opportunities for U.S. citizenship. If this occurs, immigration reformers would have to rely on much more herculean efforts to accumulate the bipartisan support required to pass the U.S. Citizenship Act introduced to Congress in February.

Related Posts:

Exclusive New EB-5 Filing Data on Rural v. High Unemployment Area Demand as of April 2024!

By Joey Barnett WR Immigration has obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request new data related to the number of Form I-526E Petitions received by Fiscal Year, Beneficiary Country of Birth, and Investment Type. This shows total filings from 2022 until  April 18, 2024.  The last similar data was from November 2023, providing an important update on the demand for EB-5.  This information will help prospective immigrant investors especially from China and India better evaluate the “hidden backlog” of pending Form I-526E cases and will also guide regional centers and EB-5 promoters where to market.     Join  WR Immigration’s Director of Visa Consulting Charlie Oppenheim and WR Partner Joey Barnett to discuss the implications of this new data during the next edition of The Bulletin – Chatting with Charlie: EB-5 Investor Outlook on September 26, 2024.  Here are five facts to know: 1. More Overall Demand for High Unemployment Area Over Rural: Through April 18, 2024, over 62% of all Form I-526Es have been in HUA.  However, in FY 2024 through April 18, 2024, that number has decreased to 53%.     2. Limited Rural Demand – Except China and India: Over 86% of all rural Form I-526Es have been […]

Immigration Update

In this edition, find the latest news on Biden’s immigration enforcement memorandum, COVID-19 vaccine requirements for travelers to Canada and Mexico, CDC rescinding the order requiring negative COVID-19 test before a flight to United States, and more! Federal Judge Vacates Biden Immigration Enforcement Memorandum On June 10, 2022, a U.S. district judge in the Southern District of Texas vacated the Biden administration’s September 2021 memorandum on immigration enforcement, which, in an effort to reduce arrests, called for a targeted enforcement or “prioritization” on removal for those who pose a “current threat to public safety”. The District judge stated that the memo’s prioritization was “arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, and failing to observe procedure under the Administrative Procedure Act.” Judge Drew Tipton said the core of the dispute was “whether the Executive Branch may require its officials to act in a manner that conflicts with a statutory mandate imposed by Congress. It may not.” The states of Texas and Louisiana argued that the memorandum conflicted with detention mandates under federal law. The judge noted that in the 1990s, Congress reined in the Executive Branch’s discretion by mandating detention of criminal aliens or those with final orders of removal: “The wisdom […]