Birthright Citizenship & Supreme Court CASA v. Trump Ruling: Frequently Asked Questions

Jun 30, 2025 | Immigration Updates

Q: What did the Supreme Court decide in CASA v. Trump on June 27?
A: On June 27, the Supreme Court ruled that federal district courts generally do not have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions, orders that halt federal policies across the country. Instead, courts can only grant relief to the individuals or groups directly involved in the lawsuit.

Q: What is a nationwide injunction, and why is it important?
A: A nationwide injunction temporarily stops the federal government from enforcing a policy nationwide while a legal challenge is underway. In CASA v. Trump, district courts used these injunctions to block a Trump-era executive order that would have denied birthright citizenship to children born in the U.S. to undocumented parents or certain noncitizens.
With this decision, federal courts can no longer universally block federal actions. Relief must now be granted on a case-by-case basis.

Q: Did this ruling eliminate birthright citizenship?
A: No. The ruling did not change the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship. Under the 14th Amendment, anyone born in the U.S. is still recognized as a U.S. citizen. However, the decision could lead to uneven enforcement of this right in different parts of the country.

Q: How might this affect families with U.S.-born children?
A: The ruling could lead to different outcomes depending on where a child is born. For example, a child born to undocumented parents in one state might be granted a U.S. birth certificate, while a child in another state might not—based on how courts in each jurisdiction rule on the Executive Order issued in January 2025.

Q: What happens next?
A: The Executive Order cannot take effect until 30 days after the Supreme Court’s June 27th decision.

Q: Why is this ruling significant?
A: The decision limits the ability of courts to halt potentially unconstitutional federal actions on a national level. It also sets the stage for inconsistent application of important rights, like citizenship, across different regions of the country.

Q: Should families be concerned?
A: Families with U.S.-born children, particularly those involving undocumented or noncitizen parents, should consult with an immigration attorney to understand how this decision may impact them. The legal environment remains uncertain and could continue to evolve in the months ahead.

Related Posts:

Immigration Update

DHS Announces Continuation of International Entrepreneur Program In another turnaround by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), it was announced on May 10, 2021, that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is withdrawing a 2018 proposed rule that would have removed the International Entrepreneur parole program from DHS regulations. USCIS said the program, first introduced in 2017, “will remain a viable program for foreign entrepreneurs to create and develop start-up entities with high growth potential in the United States.” Under the program, parole may be granted for up to three entrepreneurs per start-up entity, as well as their spouses and children. Entrepreneurs granted parole are eligible to work only for their start-up business. Their spouses may apply for employment authorization in the United States, but their children are not eligible for such authorization based on the program. An applicant must file Form I-941, Application for Entrepreneur Parole, with the required fees (including biometric) and supporting documentary evidence. The fees are $1,200 for filing theI-941 and $85 for biometrics. Additional forms and fees are required for spouses and children. Details: USCIS/DHS announcement, May 10, 2021, https://www.uscis.gov/news/news-releases/dhs-announces-continuation-of-international-entrepreneur-parole-program USCIS Temporarily Suspends Biometrics Requirement for Certain Nonimmigrants Changing or Extending Status Making the […]

WR Immigration News Digest

Supreme Court Keeps Block on Trump Administration’s Use of Alien Enemies Act to Deport Venezuelans, Sends Case Back to Fifth Circuit On May 16, 2025, in a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court sent a case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to determine whether the Trump administration can summarily deport a group of Venezuelan detainees under the Alien Enemies Act. The Supreme Court also determined that the lower federal court should rule on how much notice the federal government must provide to allow the migrants to challenge the government’s plans to deport them. Referring to circumstances such as the case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was deported by mistake and subsequently left in a Salvadoran prison despite a Supreme Court order to facilitate his return to the United States, the Supreme Court noted in this case that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.” Lee Gelernt, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, said the decision “means that more individuals will not secretly be sent to a brutal prison in El […]