Best Practices for Expedite Request to USCIS and Recent EB-5 Success

Mar 6, 2020 | Investor Visas

By:  Joseph Barnett and Colin Gallagher

Due to the uncertainty caused by COVID-19 and the current political regime’s anti-immigration rhetoric, the ability to expedite the adjudication of an application or petition for an immigration benefit is more important than ever.

With the exception of applications or petitions that have Premium Processing Service available, USCIS will consider all expedite requests on a case-by-case basis. All expedite requests must be supported by documentary evidence, and the decision of whether to grant or deny an expedite request rests solely within the discretion of USCIS.

Please note, the granting of an expedite request does not constitute an approval of the underlying application or petition. If the expedite request is granted, this merely means that USCIS will issue a decision faster than the normal processing time.

Expedite Request Criteria

USCIS has provided the following criteria to determine whether a given case is eligible for an expedite request:

  • Severe financial loss to a company or person, provided that the need for urgent action is not the result of the petitioner’s or applicant’s failure to either (a) file the benefit request or the expedite request in a reasonable time frame, or (b) respond to any requests for additional evidence in a reasonably timely manner;
  • Urgent humanitarian reasons;
  • Compelling U.S. government interests (such as urgent cases for the Department of Defense or DHS, or other public safety or national security interests); or
  • Clear USCIS error.

When attempting to prove severe financial loss to a company or person, documentation must be submitted to show that the requestor is unable to withstand the financial loss that is the natural result of normal processing times. It is important to note that for an expedite request related to the need to obtain employment authorization or student status, the need to obtain employment authorization or student status alone, without additional compelling factors, will not warrant expedited treatment.

Best Practices

The following are a few best practices our firm has employed to increase the chance of success for expedite requests:

  • Back up all assertions with credible, objective documentary evidence
    • The requestor must show USCIS how a given case satisfies the criteria outlined above, as opposed to merely asserting eligibility.
  • Pull on the heartstrings of USCIS
    • Expedite requests that are granted are often those that use a “feel good” story to supplement the documentary evidence submitted.
  • Provide letters of support from local and national interested parties
    • Particularly relevant in satisfying the U.S. government interest criterion mentioned above, letters of support from U.S. Representatives or Senators, interested state or federal agencies, and/or local economic development entities can be beneficial in helping an expedite request be granted.

Our firm has a long history of success with expedite requests.  A recent example relates to fifteen pending Forms I-526 associated with a Job Creating Entity which had used EB-5 capital to develop, construct, and operate an Assisted Living and Memory Care Facility. At the time of the expedite request, $1,500,000 of the EB-5 capital was being held in escrow to be released only upon approval of the pending Forms I-526. Our firm argued that failure to approve the expedite request would result in severe financial loss to a U.S. business, in that without the infusion of the capital being held in escrow, the U.S. business was at risk of failing. Our firm then pulled on the heartstrings of USCIS by relaying that seventy-four elderly residents, all of whom were in the age group most susceptible to COVID-19, would suddenly be without a home if the expedite request was not approved. Finally, our firm argued that the approval of the expedite request furthered compelling U.S. government interests by continuing employment of several U.S. workers and providing care to elderly U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. All of the above arguments were strongly supported via documentary evidence, and all fifteen of the pending Forms I-526 received expedited review.

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP has had several recent success stories in cases where expedite requests have been submitted. Contact a Wolfsdorf Rosenthal attorney today to discuss whether you qualify.

Related Posts:

Immigration Consequences of Marijuana Use for Green Card Holders and Non-Immigrants: Don’t Let Your Dreams and Hard Work Go Up in Smoke/Vapor

Twenty-four states, including California, and the District of Columbia have enacted laws which legalize or decriminalize the use and possession of marijuana in some form for medicinal purposes.  Four of these states (Colorado, Washington, Oregon, and Alaska) and the District of Columbia have even legalized marijuana for recreational use.  Yet, the U.S. federal government regulates marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), Title II of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970.  The CSA prohibits the manufacture, importation, possession, use, and distribution of marijuana and certain narcotics, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, anabolic steroids, and other chemicals.  The U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) has reaffirmed its position of enforcing the CSA, despite enactment of these state marijuana laws.  It is thus important to understand that state laws authorizing the use or possession of marijuana, even if used for medicinal purposes, do not change the fact that using marijuana continues to be an offense under federal law. The confusion caused by this conflict of laws is substantial, especially as it relates to U.S. immigration status.  Here are ten things lawful permanent residents (green card holders) and non-immigrants should know before smoking and/or ingesting marijuana. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1990, as amended (“INA”), states […]

5 Takeaways from the 2022 State Department Annual Report

By Joey Barnett, Partner, WR Immigration This week, the Department of State (DOS) released its 2022 Report of the Visa Office.  Charlie Oppenheim, former DOS Chief of Immigrant Visa Control Charlie Oppenheim and current Director of Visa Consulting at WR Immigration, will discuss his analysis of the report during two Chatting with Charlie webinars, which require registration to join: For over two decades, both the White House and Congressional Leadership have turned to Mr. Oppenheim for guidance on how the green card numerical control process could be updated to meet intended goals.  The Chatting with Charlie webinar series will focus on projections, predictions and guidance for strategic visa planning that will be invaluable to Human Resource Managers, in addition to visa applicants. Below are five takeaways from the report: China (Mainland) 4,060 Vietnam 772 India 641 South Korea 341 Taiwan 211 Brazil 146 Hong Kong S.A.R. 96 Iran 85 Mexico 66 Russia 51 South Africa 46 Nigeria 38 Great Britain & Northern Ireland 35 Zimbabwe 24 Turkey 24 Interestingly, 2,296 of the 4,060 issued to China-mainland nationals were issued in September 2022, suggesting that the U.S. Consulate in Guangzhou has capacity to issue more visas than it normally does (since […]