Client Payment Portal

Rapid-Fire Wednesdays Q&A |USCIS Updates: Registrations, Forms & NTAs| 3/12/2025

Mar 12, 2025 | Immigration Updates

The transcript version of our weekly Q&A livestream for corporate immigration professionals. Join our Immigration News Digest Newsletter for more immigration updates.

By Kimberley (Best) Robidoux & Miki Kawashima Matrician

🔥 Question: What is the latest update on the new registration requirement for foreign nationals?

Response: The unpublished version of the interim final rule (IFR) on the registration requirement became available on March 7th and is set to be published on March 12th. This new process, introduced as part of an executive order, will require non-citizens staying in the U.S. for more than 30 days to create a My USCIS online account, submit a G-325R form, and complete biometrics at a designated center. Once processed, they will receive a registration receipt, which they must print and carry. Failure to comply could result in fines up to $5,000 and imprisonment of up to six months. Dependent children turning 14 will also need to register within 30 days of their birthday, making this a critical requirement for HR and global mobility teams to monitor.

🔥 Question: How will this new registration requirement impact foreign national employees and HR professionals?

Response: While most foreign national workers already have I-94s and won’t need to register, this rule is particularly significant for dependent children and certain non-citizens, such as DACA and TPS holders. HR professionals should proactively communicate these requirements to employees, ensuring compliance and preventing potential penalties. The rule also mandates that any change in residential address be reported within 10 days, reinforcing the importance of staying on top of immigration obligations.

🔥 Question: What happened with the updated USCIS forms released last week?

Response: On March 3rd and 4th, USCIS issued 12 updated forms, including the I-485, I-131, and N-400, which were made effective immediately—without a grace period. This abrupt change caused significant disruption, as applications that were prepared for submission suddenly became invalid. The updates primarily involved the removal of gender identity questions and a return to using the term “aliens.” The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) advocated for a grace period, eventually leading USCIS to allow the use of older forms until April 2nd. However, after that date, only the new versions will be accepted.

🔥 Question: How do these immediate form changes impact applicants?

Response: The lack of an initial grace period created confusion and risks for applicants, as those submitting outdated forms faced rejection, potentially causing them to fall out of status. Although a temporary extension was granted, it underscores the need for HR and immigration professionals to stay vigilant about sudden regulatory changes. Moving forward, applicants should double-check form versions before submission to avoid unexpected complications.

🔥 Question: What does the new USCIS memo on Notices to Appear (NTAs) mean for foreign nationals?

Response: The latest USCIS memo clarifies that removal proceedings will be initiated when an application denial results in a foreign national losing legal status. While employment-based petition beneficiaries are exempt, their dependent family members are not. This means that if an H-1B worker’s dependent’s H-4 application is denied, the dependent could face removal proceedings even though the primary employee remains unaffected. Family-based petition beneficiaries will also be impacted, making it more crucial than ever for applicants to maintain non-immigrant status whenever possible.

🔥 Question: How should HR and immigration professionals respond to these policy changes?

Response: Given the immediate impact of these changes, HR professionals should advise employees on the importance of maintaining their underlying non-immigrant status, even when pursuing permanent residency. Employers should also work closely with immigration counsel to ensure compliance and minimize risks associated with policy shifts.

Send us your questions via DM or using the below link!

HR Question Submission Form | Rapid-Fire Wednesdays

See you next week!

Related Posts:

Immigration Update

In this edition, find out more about the Biden Administration’s response to the new Omicron Coronavirus variant, the immigration provisions within the stop-gap funding bill that averted a government shutdown, a return of the “Remain in Mexico” policy, and more. Biden Administration Increases Travel Restrictions in Response to New ‘Omicron’ Coronavirus Variant Last week, in response to concerns and unknowns about a new coronavirus variant, called Omicron (B.1.1.529), President Biden said that most travelers (excluding U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents) who had been in any of eight countries in southern Africa for the prior 14 days would be barred from entry into the United States. The countries include South Africa, Botswana, Eswatini, Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, and Zimbabwe. Since then, the new variant has spread to at least 23 countries, including the United States, and more are likely, according to the World Health Organization. The Biden administration subsequently announced additional measures, effective December 6, 2021, including a requirement that inbound international passengers take a COVID-19 viral test within a day of their departure, regardless of their vaccination status, and an extension of a mask requirement on domestic flights and public transportation—including buses, trains, planes, bus terminals, and airports—through March […]

Read More

WR Immigration News Digest

Supreme Court Keeps Block on Trump Administration’s Use of Alien Enemies Act to Deport Venezuelans, Sends Case Back to Fifth Circuit On May 16, 2025, in a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court sent a case back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to determine whether the Trump administration can summarily deport a group of Venezuelan detainees under the Alien Enemies Act. The Supreme Court also determined that the lower federal court should rule on how much notice the federal government must provide to allow the migrants to challenge the government’s plans to deport them. Referring to circumstances such as the case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was deported by mistake and subsequently left in a Salvadoran prison despite a Supreme Court order to facilitate his return to the United States, the Supreme Court noted in this case that “notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster.” Lee Gelernt, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, said the decision “means that more individuals will not secretly be sent to a brutal prison in El […]

Read More