Rapid-Fire Wednesdays Q&A | Executive Orders | 1/29/2025 Recap

Feb 5, 2025 | Immigration Updates

The transcript version of our weekly Q&A livestream for corporate immigration professionals. Join our Immigration News Digest Newsletter for more immigration updates.

By Kimberley (Best) Robidoux & Miki Kawashima Matrician

🔥 Question: What is the impact of the executive order on birthright citizenship?

Response: One of the most significant executive orders signed seeks to eliminate birthright citizenship. This policy directly contradicts the 14th Amendment, which has long established that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen. If enforced, this order could fundamentally alter citizenship rights, impacting both individuals and global mobility programs. Immigration professionals should monitor developments closely and advise affected employees accordingly.

🔥 Question: What does the executive order on national security and visa vetting entail?

Response: The order mandates a review of countries deemed to have insufficient visa vetting processes. This could lead to travel restrictions or additional scrutiny for individuals from specific nations. Employers should prepare for potential delays in visa approvals and increased security-related reviews for foreign national employees. Companies should ensure that their compliance measures align with these evolving requirements.

🔥 Question: How should employers and foreign nationals prepare for compliance checks?

Response: Given the likelihood of increased USCIS and FDNS site visits, employers should ensure their public access files and I-9 documents are up to date. H-1B, L-1, and STEM OPT extension workers should maintain proper documentation, including I-797 approval notices and I-129S forms. Immigration professionals should also remind employees to carry physical copies of their I-94s and passports, as digital versions may not always be accessible in crucial moments.

🔥 Question: What enforcement actions should companies be aware of?

Response: The executive order could lead to more Department of Labor investigations and ICE worksite actions. Employers should be aware that a wage and hour investigation could escalate into an I-9 audit. Additionally, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) may conduct unannounced inspections. Employers must not waive their three-day notice for I-9 audits and should work with legal counsel to ensure compliance in advance.

🔥 Question: How can companies strengthen their compliance programs?

Response: Organizations should conduct biannual internal audits with immigration counsel to ensure all documentation and procedures align with legal requirements. Establishing clear document retention policies is crucial—companies should not retain outdated or incorrect documents beyond the required period. Training front desk personnel, HR teams, and managers on handling government site visits appropriately is also key to maintaining compliance.

🔥 Question: What role does global mobility play in managing these risks?

Response: Global mobility professionals must work closely with HR, in-house counsel, and leadership to strengthen best practices. Their role extends beyond compliance—they must also help employees navigate policy changes and potential disruptions. Ensuring that affected employees receive the necessary guidance and legal support will be critical in adapting to these executive orders.

Send us your questions via DM or using the below link!

HR Question Submission Form | Rapid-Fire Wednesdays

See you next week!

Related Posts:

President Biden Revokes Trump-Era Ban on Entry of Many Immigrants; State Dept. Instructs Exceptions to Nonimmigrant Ban

On February 24, 2021, President Biden revoked former President Trump’s proclamation issued in April 2020 that banned many immigrants from entering the United States. Biden Proclamation Revoking Immigrant Ban President Biden’s proclamation states that the Trump-era ban, whose stated purpose was to prevent entry by those who presented a risk to the U.S. labor market during the coronavirus outbreak, does not advance the interests of the United States. “To the contrary, it harms the United States” and “harms industries in the United States that utilize talent from around the world,” the new proclamation states. It also “harms individuals who were selected to receive the opportunity to apply for, and those who have likewise received” fiscal year 2020 diversity visas. The Biden proclamation orders the Departments of State, Labor, and Homeland Security to review any related regulations, orders, guidance, policies, or other agency actions and, as appropriate, issue revised guidance consistent with the new proclamation. DOS Instructions on Exceptions to Nonimmigrant Ban The new Biden proclamation did not lift a Trump-era ban on certain H-1B, H-2B, L-1, and J-1 temporary work visas, set to expire on March 31, 2021. It is unclear whether the Biden administration plans to revoke that ban […]

Rapid-Fire Wednesdays Q&A | 2024 End of Year Immigration Law Updates | 1/15/2025 Recap

The transcript version of our weekly Q&A livestream for corporate immigration professionals. Join our Immigration News Digest Newsletter for more immigration updates. By Kimberley (Best) Robidoux & Miki Kawashima Matrician 🔥 Question: What changes did the U.S. Department of State make to the J-1 Exchange Visitor Skills List? Response: The Department of State made a significant update to the J-1 Exchange Visitor Skills List, which had not been revised since 2009. Effective December 9, 2024, 37 countries were removed from the skills list, including Brazil, China, India, and South Korea. This change is retroactive, meaning individuals from these countries who were previously subject to the two-year home residency requirement are no longer restricted, even if they were in the J-1 program when the requirement applied. As a result, these individuals can now pursue U.S. visas like H-1B, L-1, or green cards without delay. This update benefits employers by making it easier to retain talent without requiring waivers or a mandatory return to the home country. However, the two-year residency requirement remains unchanged for foreign national physicians undergoing medical residency or graduate medical education. 🔥 Question: What is the new policy regarding medical examination results for Form I-485 Adjustment of Status […]