Frustrated with Temporary Green Card Stamps While I-829 Pending? WR Has a Solution for You

Sep 11, 2020 | Investor Visas

USCIS processing of Forms I-829 Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status has taken a turn for the worse, and conditional green card holders are suffering with the bureaucratic challenges that arise from USCIS’ delays, which damage their ability to live in the United States and fully derive the benefits of their conditional lawful permanent residency.  It appears that USCIS has a pattern and practice of delaying adjudications on Forms I-829 in an attempt to make life harder for immigrants and causing some to give up, despite regulations requiring a decision or interview within 90 days of filing.

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP has a solution to compel USCIS to finalize a Form I-829 adjudication within a reasonable amount of time – file a lawsuit in federal court under the Administrative Procedures Act.

USCIS reports on its website the following average processing time on a Form I-829.  Since 2016, processing times have increased nearly 95%.

Fiscal YearProcessing Times in Months
201619.1
201727.7
201827.1
201933.3
202037.2

USCIS now reports processing times of 33 to 59 months for Forms I-829 (though in November 2020 it was up to 234 months!).

The 18-month conditional green card extension issued with a timely filed Form I-829 is insufficient to cover the amount of time it takes USCIS to adjudicate the Form I-829, requiring conditional green card holders to obtain I-551 extension stamps on their passports every year to confirm their U.S. immigration status, which is needed to (a) demonstrate work authorization, (b) renew driver’s licenses, and (c) travel internationally freely.

Obtaining the I-551 extension stamps requires attending a USCIS InfoPass appointment.  During the COVID-19 global pandemic, USCIS has reduced the number of appointments available and even require evidence of a medical or business emergency abroad, despite the fact that it is unlawful under U.S. law to be in the country without unexpired proof of immigration status.

Further, EB-5 investors are able to get their funds repaid after 2 years of conditional residency, but many EB-5 projects have repayment terms upon I-829 approval, subjecting their funds to further risk.  Additionally, for those who wish to become a U.S. citizens, USCIS will not finalize the adjudication of a Form N-400 until the Form I-829 is approved.

USCIS’ delay is not due to lack of agency resources, the number of cases on file, or any provision in the law.  It is an attempt to limit legal immigration and deny green card holders their right to live without restrictions in the United States.  The delay is not justified, and a lawsuit in federal court under the Administrative Procedures Act can push USCIS to make a final decision on a Form I-829.  Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP continues to have success with its lawsuits against USCIS and expects the demand for these cases to rise as USCIS’ delays continue.

Related Posts:

5 Things to Know About USCIS’ New Policy on Expedite Criteria

By:  Joseph Barnett and Afshan Randera On May 10, 2019, USCIS updated its policy on Expedite Requests, effective immediately.  We previously blogged about expedite processing requests in the context of EB-5 applications, but this new policy applies to the adjudication of an application or petition for an immigration benefit by USCIS, though some exceptions apply.  Here are five things to know about requesting an expedite of an application or petition by USCIS:  1. Criteria. The criteria have been narrowed, and USCIS will only consider an expedite request if it meets one of the following criteria: (a) urgent humanitarian reasons; (b) compelling U.S. government interests (such as public safety and national security interests); (c) an error on the part of USCIS; or (d) severe financial loss to a company or person. 2. Severe Financial Loss. While documentation is required to support any expedite request, USCIS states that where a company or individual claims “severe financial loss,” the actual loss must be documented, and the requestor must demonstrate that he/she/it is not able to withstand the temporary financial loss that is the natural result of normal processing times.    Additionally, “severe financial loss” is not warranted if the petitioner or applicant failed to file the benefit request in a reasonable time […]

Read More

BELGIUM: Immigration reform aims to expedite single permit application processing

Summary of the Issue – After much lobbying, the Belgian government is taking actions to reform the single permit application process with the goal of improving processing timeframes. Implemented on January 1, 2019, the single permit application allows non-EU employees to work in multiple branches of an EU-based multinational company. The single permit replaced a two-sided process for obtaining residence and work permits each with their own rules and procedures. Policy Reform – The reforms focuses on increasing the number of immigration bureaucrats, streamlining internal processes, and taking advantage of technology efficiencies. Impact – Upon implementation, the reforms promise to expedite immigration processing by allowing single permit holders (including first-time applicants, renewal applicants, and those changing employers) to start or continue employment upon approval of regional authorities.  First-time applicants must still obtain approval from federal authorities, but can begin working upon approval from local authorities. More Information – “Single Permit as of January 1, 2019 – AN Analysis” “Single Permit Application Procedure”

Read More