Five Things to Know About Long I-829 Processing Times and Abandonment of Green Card Status

Aug 6, 2020 | Investor Visas

By: Joseph Barnett, Robert Blanco, and Afshan Randera

With current Form I-829 average processing times extending beyond 3 years, it’s critical for EB-5 conditional green card holders to maintain lawful immigration status. U.S. laws provide immigration officers the right to scrutinize a green card holder’s entry upon their return from overseas to determine one’s immigration status.  Those absent from the United States for extended periods of time risk the unintentional abandonment of green card status, if a U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (“CBP”) officer determines the foreign national no longer has intent to maintain the U.S. as the principal place of residence.  Here are 5 things to know about involuntary abandonment of green card (conditional or permanent) status:

1. No Specific Time Required. We are often asked how long one must remain in the United States after obtaining a conditional green card, but there is no magic number or specific timeframe for defining or calculating abandonment of status – each situation requires an inquiry into the individual’s intentions and actions.  Sometimes green card holders believe that they can make short visits every six months or a year, but regular visits to the U.S. by a green card holder whose real residence is in another country may not protect that person.  That said, a green card holder can stay outside the country for more than 6 months/ one year and still maintain permanent resident status.  Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP suggests green card holders obtain a reentry permit prior to long periods of absence.

2. Intent Matters, But Facts Do Too. If a green card holder does not have the intent to permanently reside in the United States, he/she can technically lose their status, even if they visit the U.S. often. A green card holder may have multiple residences, but the U.S. residence must be the permanent one.  It is important to demonstrate that the departure from the United States was made with the intent of returning to an “unrelinquished residence,” (or that the stay abroad was for reasons beyond the foreign national’s control).  Green card holders can establish residency and show ties by keeping in regular contact with family in the U.S., even while on trips abroad; maintaining work/ work offers in the U.S.; filing taxes as a U.S. resident; maintaining financial accounts in the U.S.; renting or owning a residence; or other community ties.  Retaining supporting documentary evidence is important to demonstrate such ties.

3. Derivative EB-5 Beneficiaries. Until the permanent green card is obtained, EB-5 investors must be aware that their immigration status directly affects their dependent family members.  If the primary investor is found to have abandoned his/her status, then the dependent family members will be unable to file the Form I-829 without the investor.  Additionally, unless concluded otherwise, an alien child under the age of 16 years is not considered to possess a will or intent separate from that of the parents with regard to a protracted stay abroad.

4. Form I-407. When returning to the United States from a long trip abroad, CBP may question the reason for the length of the trip and purpose of being abroad.  If CBP deems an absence is too long or irregular , the CBP officer may judge that the green card holder has abandoned status. In some cases, they will try to make a permanent resident sign a Form I-407 “Record of Abandonment” statement declaring that he/she is voluntarily abandoning the green card.  A Form I-407 must be signed voluntarily, and there are no negative consequences for refusal to sign the form. However; in such instance, CBP must issue a Notice to Appear (NTA) before an immigration judge who will decide if permanent residence has been abandoned.

5. Application for Naturalization. Rules for maintaining green card status are separate and apart from those related to naturalization, which requires continuous residence in the United States for at least 5 years immediately preceding the date of filing Form N-400.  However, one circumstance where the U.S. government will question whether an abandonment of status has occurred is during an application for naturalization, in which a green card holder must declare and explicitly show the dates in and out of the country. If out of the country most of the time or there is irregularity, this would stand out, and the government may deny the naturalization application and even determine that you have abandoned status.

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP has the expertise and experience to help an individual deemed to have involuntary abandoned his/her green card status.  Contact a Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP attorney with any questions about abandonment of status.

Related Posts:

Mandamus Litigation – the Solution for Unreasonably Delayed Employment and Travel Authorization Cards

USCIS processing times have been frustratingly long and made even worse due to COVID-19. Unfortunately, the delays are now getting longer and adversely impacting the lives of employers, employees and families. As a result, more immigrants are turning to the courts for a solution. The judicial system can provide relief when experiencing unreasonable delays for immigrant benefits – including processing an employment authorization document (EAD) and advance parole travel permits (AP) after an adjustment of status application has been filed. Depending on the facts, WR Immigration (WR) has a solution to compel USCIS to finalize adjudication within a reasonable amount of time by filing a lawsuit in federal court. Filing a lawsuit against USCIS to adjudicate an EAD/AP has sadly become more common in other U.S. immigration contexts, such as for nonimmigrants on H-4 visas seeking work permission. The same legal theories can be applied to persons with pending adjustments including EB-5 investors with pending EADs/APs. EAD/AP applications that have been pending for well over 6 months may now be actionable. In this process, WR attorneys prepare a complaint including information about each individual’s case and then the lawsuit is filed in federal district court.  After serving a summons and the […]

Canada’s Cannabis Conundrum – 5 Things Every U.S. Visa Holder Should Know

By: Joseph Barnett Canada has officially legalized the production, distribution, sale and possession of cannabis across Canada. While some foreign nationals may want to head north and celebrate, beware of potential consequences upon re-entry into the United States, and aware of your rights and the rights of U.S. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) officers. Here are five things every U.S. visa holder should know about Canada’s legalization of marijuana: 1. Inadmissible Upon Re-Entry. The Immigration and Nationality Act is written in a way such that an actual conviction of a marijuana-related offense is not required to bar admission to the U.S. An alien can be found inadmissible to the U.S. for simply admitting to committing the essential elements of any marijuana-related offense under current U.S. immigration law, even if legal in Canada. 2. Limited Waiver Available. There’s a limited waiver of inadmissibility under the INA, but not applicable for a recent “offense”. In certain situations, it may be possible to argue that the inadmissibility charge was made in error. 3. It is illegal to bring marijuana back to U.S. Even if legal in the state to which you are traveling, it is still a federal crime and illegal to cross international borders with marijuana. 4. Searches by CBP. CBP has […]