7 Things We Learned from New EB-5 Program Chief Sarah M. Kendall

Aug 6, 2020 | Investor Visas

By: Joseph Barnett

Earlier this week, new Immigrant Investor Program Office Chief Sarah Kendall addressed the EB-5 community at the AILA/IIUSA EB-5 Industry Forum in Chicago, Illinois. We are happy to see this type of engagement by USCIS and are hopeful for continued dialogue to address the concerns of immigrant investors and regional centers. Here are seven things we learned from Ms. Kendall:

1. Minor Investors

Ms. Kendall confirmed there is no age limit for minors filing as the principal investors but indicated that USCIS will continue to look at issues of contractual capacity and voidability of investment contracts.

2. Bridge Financing

Ms. Kendall indicated it was difficult to provide specific guidance on the issue of bridge financing because of the “diversity of work and financial arrangements and structures.” She noted that the term of the loan, by itself, does not disqualify financing as a bridge loan that would receive credit for job creation purposed and that USCIS will look at interim nature of loan and contemplation of future receipt of EB-5 (or other) capital to repay the bridge financing. This is inconsistent with language in RFEs previously issued by USCIS. Additional guidance clarifying this important issue is required to provide certainty for all participants in EB-5.

3. Compliance Reviews

Ms. Kendall stated that, as part of its emphasis on “integrity measures,” USCIS will look at a Regional Center’s organizational, administrative, and management capabilities (internal financial controls and processes for due diligence) as well as evidence of purported job creation, to confirm what has been submitted in Form I-924A applications (due December 29, 2018!). USCIS will perform a site assessment after issuing a “Notice of Compliance Review” and document the results in a compliance report, which becomes part of the regional center’s record.

4. No Substitution of Minor for Parent

Ms. Kendall indicated that USCIS does not see a legal basis to allow parent to substitute child as investor and retain the parent’s priority date. We’ve previously blogged on the practical side of accomplishing a substitution in compliance with EB-5 rules.

5. Redeployment

Ms. Kendall noted that, when determining whether redeployment is “consistent with the scope of the new commercial enterprise’s ongoing business,” USCIS will look at the NCE’s organizational documents, private placement memorandum, and business plan for JCE. This is another area in EB-5 that needs better guidance for the industry to have predictability.

6. Material Change

Ms. Kendall announced that USCIS is conscious of the human element in EB-5 but noted that lack of statutory clarity for USCIS to provide guidance that encompasses all issues surrounding the concept of “material change,” which become increasingly important with EB-5 visa waiting times and extended investment periods.

7. Reduction of Pending I-526 Petition Backlog

Ms. Kendall noted the increased production at IPO in reducing the backlog of I-526 petitions, with fewer pending now since FY 2014. We are hopeful that I-829 adjudication timelines will soon drop too.

Related Posts:

Can a Conditional Green Card Holder Marry a U.S. Citizen and Get a New Green Card in the U.S. Via Adjustment of Status When Investment Fails to Create Sufficient Jobs?

Short answer, yes. We just attended the adjustment interview while working with well-known EB-5 lawyer Tammy Fox-Isicoff to obtain an approval. In this case, the foreign national obtained conditional permanent residency through an EB-5 application that ultimately failed. Fortunately, she met a life partner, entered into a good faith marriage with her U.S. citizen husband, and intentionally did not file a Form I-829 so her immigrant status lapsed.  Since the EB-5 program involves a two-step procedure of first getting a two-year conditional green card, the applicant has a lot of pressure to ensure adequate jobs are created when submitting the I-829 application to remove the conditional nature of the green card. This application must be filed during the 90-day window preceding the 24-month anniversary of the card issuance. If the requisite number of jobs have not been created, the I-829 application will ultimately be denied, and the applicant can be placed in removal or deportation proceedings. This deadline to file a Form I-829, Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status causes grave concern for this group of people, and sadly, these facts are becoming more common due to the COVID-19 global pandemic and the contraction of the […]

Direct EB-5 Due Diligence: Buyer Beware (and Immigration Attorneys Be Cautious)

Authored by Joseph Barnett and Bernard Wolfsdorf, on behalf of AILA EB-5 Committee There has been a lot of recent interest from prospective immigrant investors in direct EB-5, including “pooled direct” investments.  This is partially because the more popular EB-5 Regional Center program is waiting for reauthorization, and the (likely temporary) minimum investment requirement presently at $500,000 for job creation in a Targeted Employment Area (“TEA”).[1]  As a result, the AILA EB-5 Committee would like to share their thoughts on specific issues related to the representation of direct EB-5 clients, as a high percentage of direct EB-5 cases appear to run into difficulties. Limited Scope of Representation.  As lawyers, we can rely on outside professionals (such as accountants and business advisors) to provide advice in areas we are not competent to handle. Being a good immigration lawyer and advising clients regarding investor visas does not require that every lawyer handling these cases must be competent in the tax, business, and accounting work that is a critical part of the EB-5 framework. It is correct to state that EB-5 requires a team including the immigration lawyers, corporate lawyers, franchise lawyers, securities lawyer, business plan writer, accountant, banker, and the list goes […]