5 Reasons Indian Citizens Should Consider EB-5 in 2019

Jan 3, 2019 | Investor Visas

By: Robert J. Blanco, Esq.

Indian citizens with the goal of relocating to the U.S. are faced with procedural hurdles that increase the difficultly of living and working in the U.S.  Students applying for H-1B visas are subject to an H-1B lottery with poor odds, forcing them to return home at the end of their Optional Practical Training period. Those lucky enough to make it through the lottery and have an employer willing to sponsor them for a green card face massive backlogs in the EB-2 and EB-3 categories creating decades long waits. The EB-5 program presents a number of solutions to these issues.

The EB-5 program offers permanent residency to foreign nationals who invest at least $500,000 into a U.S. business that creates 10 full-time jobs for American workers.  The investor’s spouse and unmarried children under 21 years of age are also eligible to receive green cards through the same investment. Each investor must prove that the funds used to invest in the EB-5 project originated from a lawful source.

Immigrating to the U.S. continued to be difficult in 2018, with more restrictions expected in 2019. Due to these challenges, Indian applicants filed more EB-5 applications than any other country in 2018. Here are five updated reasons why EB-5 may be an especially attractive option for Indian citizens right now:

1. EB-5 backlog expected to begin in 2019. As of the January 2019 Visa Bulletin, the EB-5 category is still the only current category for Indian applicants.  However, as we have reported in the past, this will not continue much longer.  With the significant increase in Indian EB-5 filings, a backlog in this category is expected to begin no later than July 2019.  But, the longer one waits to get in line, the longer the EB-5 backlog will be. 

2. Shorter wait times for persons chargeable to the Indian quota. The anticipated EB-5 backlog will be significantly shorter than the Indian EB-2 or EB-3 backlogs.  For those with later EB-2 or EB-3 priority dates, EB-5 is likely a much faster option. Determining which preference category will be faster is difficult and depends on many different variables. 

3. Avoid the H-1B visa. Obtaining an H-1B visa is as hard as it has ever been, with even strong cases receive gnarly Requests for Evidence and denials at increased rates. Spouses on H-4 visas who have been issued work authorization will likely see that benefit eliminated as well. Permanent residents through EB-5 do not need employer sponsorship, so they are more attractive to U.S. employers and enjoy greater freedom of career movement.

4. In-state tuition. As permanent residents, many students are eligible for in-state tuition at public universities. In-state tuition rates are often significantly cheaper than the full tuition rate normally charged to foreign nationals.

5. The EB-5 Regional Center program must be extended once government shutdown ends. Although we expect the Regional Center program to be reauthorized again as it has since 1990, both Congress and DHS have proposed a number of changes to the program. Legislative proposals would raise the minimum investment amount to $925,000 but DHS regulations would raise the minimum investment amount to $1.35 million.  Without legislation, the proposed regulations are moving forward, with enactment previously planned for 2018 and already overdue.  Therefore, it may be more expensive to apply through the EB-5 program in the near future.

The EB-5 program offers a unique opportunity that avoids many challenges of employer sponsorship. With significant immigration changes on the horizon, Indian applicants should seriously consider EB-5 before it becomes more expensive and subject to a longer visa backlog.

Related Posts:

Visa Denials Based on Communist Party Membership

By:  Joseph Barnett Reports from China indicate that the U.S. Consulate General in Guangzhou has recently increased immigrant visa denials based on INA Section 212(a)(3)(D) related to membership in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), despite the fact that such membership is required and involuntary for most to advance in university, business, or employment. These immigrant visa denials have been issued after applicants have been placed in administrative processing under INA Section 221(g) after completing an information sheet related to their employment and education history.  It is critical that visa applicants speak with experienced immigration attorneys prior to submitting a response to the Consulate, as this may be the only time to put forward an argument to the consular officer as to why this ground of inadmissibility does not apply.  For example, the U.S. Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual provides relief for members whose membership was “non-meaningful,” as found by the U.S. Supreme Court in Rowoldt v. Pefetto, 355 U.S. 115 (1957) and Gastelum-Quinones v. Kennedy, 374 U.S. 469 (1963). Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP attorneys have had numerous successes preparing legal briefs to rebut claims of inadmissibility under INA Section 212(a)(3)(D).  Our firm has also obtained waivers for immigrant visa applications by filing […]

EB5 Investors: USCIS Launches New $20K Fee for EB-5 Regional Centers, Managing Partner Bernie Wolfsdorf Responds

The Department of Homeland Security has posted a Federal Register notice alerting EB-5 stakeholders that the USCIS will begin collecting funds for the EB-5 Integrity Fund to administer the EB-5 Regional Center Program, as required by the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022. In their blog piece analyzing this update, EB5 Investors Magazine staff reached out to WR Managing Partner Bernie Wolfsdorf for comment. In the article, Wolfsdorf states, “[t]he decision by USCIS to collect a $20,000 Integrity Fee from regional centers in addition to all the other fees collected, is highway robbery, especially when coupled with the threat to terminate the designation of any regional center that does not pay the fee within 90 days of the due date.” To read the entire blog piece, visit the EB5 site>>