Update on President Trump’s Travel Ban

By: Bernard Wolfsdorf, Esq. and Joseph M. Barnett, Esq.

On Friday, February 3, 2016, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington issued a nation-wide Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) against President Trump, and certain government agencies and officials acting under him, temporarily stopping the U.S. government from enforcing President Trump’s Executive Order on immigration of January 27, 2017.  The court ruled that the TRO should be on a nationwide basis to ensure that U.S. immigration laws are implemented uniformly.

On Saturday, February 4, 2017, the Trump Administration declared it was appealing the decision with an emergency motion to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and requested an immediate administrative stay pending full consideration of the emergency motion.  However, on Sunday, February 5, 2017, the appeals court denied the request for an immediate reinstatement of the Executive Order.

In opposition to the U.S. government’s emergency motion, the State of Washington submitted a joint declaration from former national security, foreign policy, and intelligence officials in the U.S. government, such as former Secretary of State Madeleine K. Albright; former Secretary of State John F. Kerry; Leon E. Panetta, former Secretary of Defense and former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency; and Susan E. Rice, former National Security Advisor and former U.S. Representative to the United States, indicating that the Executive Order will harm the interests of the United States.  This joint declaration provides additional concerns regarding the lack of rational basis behind, and unprecedented scope of, the Executive Order which suspends admission for such a broad class of people.

The U.S. government’s reply in support of the emergency motion is due today, Monday, February 6, 2017 at 3:00pm PST.  We expect the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to make a decision on the emergency motion soon thereafter. You can review documents filed in this case from the timeline below.

Additionally, the U.S. Department of State (“DOS”) has provided an update on the provisionally revoked valid visas of nationals from last week.  The DOS has indicated that “provisional revocation is now lifted, and those visas are now valid for travel to the United States, if the holder is otherwise eligible.”  The DOS directs individuals whose visas are expired, or were physically cancelled, to apply for a new visa at a U.S. embassy or consulate, absent a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) decision to grant parole or waive the visa requirement at the port of entry.

Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP is a full-service immigration law firm known worldwide for its unmatched excellence in providing top-quality U.S. immigration representation. Subscribe to our immigration blog to remain updated and contact Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP Immigration Law offices if you have any questions. We have Immigration Law Offices in New York and Los Angeles.

This blog was posted in: Travel, USCIS
This blog was tagged: President Trump
This post is designed to provide practical and useful information on the subject matter covered. However, it is provided with the understanding that no legal, tax, accounting, or other professional services are being rendered or provided. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.
Los Angeles Immigration Lawyer
1416 2nd Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
: 310-570-4088

New York Immigration Lawyer
641 Lexington Avenue, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10022
: 212-899-5040
China Representative Office
22F, Tower 3, Jing An Kerry Centre,
1228 Yan’an Road Middle, Shanghai, China 200040
上海市延安中路1228号嘉里中心三期22楼 : 31063449
Copyright 2018 Wolfsdorf Rosenthal LLP (all rights reserved).
: visalaw@wolfsdorf.com